scholarly journals Higher Strength Lanthanum Carbonate Provides Serum Phosphorus Control With a Low Tablet Burden and Is Preferred by Patients and Physicians: A Multicenter Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1437-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajnish Mehrotra ◽  
Kevin J. Martin ◽  
Steven Fishbane ◽  
Stuart M. Sprague ◽  
Steven Zeig ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Akizawa ◽  
Hironori Kanda ◽  
Masayuki Takanuma ◽  
Jun Kinoshita ◽  
Masafumi Fukagawa

Abstract Background and Aims Phosphate binders (PB) are usually prescribed to dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia. Several studies have reported that higher PB pill burden may reduce adherence and lead to insufficient phosphorus control. Tenapanor is an investigational, minimally absorbed, orally administered, non-binder, small-molecule that inhibits the sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3) in development for the control of serum phosphorus. A previous Ph3 study sponsored by Ardelyx, Inc. (NCT02675998) showed a significant phosphorus decrease compared to the placebo in patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in the US. Tenapanor was expected to reduce PB pill burden since it is administered as one small pill, taken twice a day. This was the first study in Japanese HD patients, which aimed to confirm whether tenapanor reduces the pill burden of PB. Method This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm Ph2 study. The study consists of a screening period, a 3-week observation period, and a 26-week treatment period. Patients whose serum phosphorus level was ≥ 3.5 and ≤ 7.0 mg/dL, taking at least two PB pills three times a day were enrolled. The patients started to receive 30 mg of tenapanor twice daily. The tenapanor dose could be reduced in a step-wise manner (60, 40, 20 and 10 mg/day) at the investigator’s discretion, based on GI tolerability. PB treatment was continued according to individual regimens, however, the dose could be adjusted appropriately to maintain serum phosphorus level within ±0.5 mg/dL from the baseline. The primary endpoint was an achievement of at least a 30% decrease in the mean of the total number of PB and tenapanor pills compared to the number of PB pills at baseline. The proportion of patients who achieved at least a 30 % decrease were tested using binomial test with a threshold level of 20% and a one-sided significance level of 0.025. The analysis was conducted using the data as of Dec25, 2019. Results The primary endpoint was met. Of 67 enrolled patients at the timing of analysis, 48 patients (71.6%, [95% CI: 59.3% - 82.0%], p<0.001) achieved a 30% decrease in the total number of PB and tenapanor pills, and of those, 35 patients (52.2%, [95% CI: 39.7% - 64.6%]) achieved a 50% decrease and 18 patients (26.9%) no longer required the use of any PB at week 26. Mean phosphorus levels were maintained during the study from 5.2 mg/dL at the baseline to 4.7 mg/dL at week 26. The most frequent adverse event was diarrhea (76.1%), which was mostly mild to moderate. Only four patients discontinued the study due to diarrhea. Serious adverse events were reported in five patients, only two of which were related to tenapanor (diarrhea and acute myocardial infarction). Conclusion Tenapanor was able to provide phosphorus control with significantly fewer pills compared to PB. AE profile was similar to previous US studies. This result suggests that tenapanor, a non-binder, phosphate absorption inhibitor that provides a novel approach to the management of hyperphosphatemia, could potentially improve drug adherence by reducing PB pill burden while maintaining effective phosphorus control.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 2-8
Author(s):  
Ryoichi Ando ◽  
Satomi Yama ◽  
Tsuyoshi Ohnishi ◽  
Shunsuke Iwamoto ◽  
Hitoshi Kimura ◽  
...  

Nephron ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 144 (9) ◽  
pp. 428-439
Author(s):  
Adrian C. Covic ◽  
Stuart M. Sprague ◽  
Anjay Rastogi ◽  
Markus Ketteler ◽  
Sebastian Walpen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuri Yamashita ◽  
Tetsuya Ogawa ◽  
Masaki Takahashi ◽  
Tetsuya Mitsuhashi ◽  
Junichi Shizuku ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 475-482
Author(s):  
Kyoko Ito ◽  
Nobuo Nagano ◽  
Tomoaki Takahashi ◽  
Hideki Ishida ◽  
Ayaka Tagahara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ito ◽  
Hideki Fujii ◽  
Keiji Kono ◽  
Shunsuke Goto ◽  
Shinichi Nishi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ge ◽  
Niroj Mali ◽  
WenXing Fan

Abstract To compare the clinical efficacy of sevalamer carbonate and lanthanum carbonate in chronic hemodialysis patients. This prospective observational study included 80 patients randomly divided into two groups were followed from December 2019 to December 2020. After 12 months of maintenance hemodialysis treatment with sevalamer carbonate or lanthanum carbonate, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase(ALP), parathyroid hormone (iPTH), low-density lipoprotein(LDL), hemoglobin(HGB), triglycerides(TG) and albumin(ALB) were evaluated. The adequacy of dialysis, the effective rate of treatment and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared as well. After treatment, In lanthanum carbonate group, serum phosphorus and iPTH decreased and albumin increased, the difference was significant(P < 0.05). In sevalamer carbonate group, serum phosphorus and LDL decreased and albumin increased after treatment, the difference was significant(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the dialysis adequacy and total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions in the sevalamer carbonate group was lower than in the lanthanum carbonate group and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The two phosphate binders are safe and effective for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with ESKD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Nevertheless, sevalamer carbonate seems to be superior with lowering the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions and improving lipid metabolism.


2003 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. S73-S78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. D'Haese ◽  
Goce B. Spasovski ◽  
Aleksander Sikole ◽  
Alastair Hutchison ◽  
Tony J. Freemont ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document