scholarly journals Developmental Changes of Top-down Attentional Modulation in Saliency Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-273
Author(s):  
백종수 ◽  
Mee-Kyoung Kwon
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J. González-Villar ◽  
Marina Pidal-Miranda ◽  
Manuel Arias ◽  
Dolores Rodríguez-Salgado ◽  
María T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia W Y Kam ◽  
Randolph F Helfrich ◽  
Anne-Kristin Solbakk ◽  
Tor Endestad ◽  
Pål G Larsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Decades of electrophysiological research on top–down control converge on the role of the lateral frontal cortex in facilitating attention to behaviorally relevant external inputs. However, the involvement of frontal cortex in the top–down control of attention directed to the external versus internal environment remains poorly understood. To address this, we recorded intracranial electrocorticography while subjects directed their attention externally to tones and responded to infrequent target tones, or internally to their own thoughts while ignoring the tones. Our analyses focused on frontal and temporal cortices. We first computed the target effect, as indexed by the difference in high frequency activity (70–150 Hz) between target and standard tones. Importantly, we then compared the target effect between external and internal attention, reflecting a top–down attentional effect elicited by task demands, in each region of interest. Both frontal and temporal cortices showed target effects during external and internal attention, suggesting this effect is present irrespective of attention states. However, only the frontal cortex showed an enhanced target effect during external relative to internal attention. These findings provide electrophysiological evidence for top–down attentional modulation in the lateral frontal cortex, revealing preferential engagement with external attention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Lei ◽  
Yu Ding ◽  
Qingxin Meng

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) refers to the suppression of the startle reflex when the intense startling stimulus is shortly (20–500 ms) preceded by a weak non-startling stimulus (prepulse). Although the main neural correlates of PPI lie in the brainstem, previous research has revealed that PPI can be top-down modulated by attention. However, in the previous attend-to-prepulse PPI paradigm, only continuous prepulse but not discrete prepulse (20 ms) could elicit attentional modulation of PPI. Also, the relationship between the attentional enhancement of PPI and the changes in early cortical representations of prepulse signals is unclear. This study develops a novel attend-to-prepulse PPI task, when the discrete prepulse is set at 150 ms at a lead interval of 270 ms, and reveals that the PPI with attended prepulse is larger than the PPI with ignored prepulse. In addition, the early cortical representations (N1/P2 complex) of the prepulse show dissociation between the attended and ignored prepulse. N1 component is enhanced by directed attention, and the attentional increase of the N1 component is positively correlated with the attentional enhancement of PPI, whereas the P2 component is not affected by attentional modulation. Thus, directed attention to the prepulse can enhance both PPI and the early cortical representation of the prepulse signal (N1).


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana K. Singh ◽  
Kazushige Touhara ◽  
Masako Okamoto

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 777-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg H. Recanzone ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz

The responses of neurons in monkey extrastriate areas MT (middle temporal) and MST (medial superior temporal), and the initial metrics of saccadic and pursuit eye movements, have previously been shown to be better predicted by vector averaging or winner-take-all models depending on the stimulus conditions. To investigate the potential influences of attention on the neuronal activity, we measured the responses of single MT and MST neurons under identical stimulus conditions when one of two moving stimuli was the target for a pursuit eye movement. We found the greatest attentional modulation across neurons when two stimuli moved through the receptive field (RF) of the neuron and the stimulus motion was initiated at least 450 ms before reaching the center of the RF. These conditions were the same as those in which a winner-take-all model better predicted both the eye movements and the underlying neuronal activity. The modulation was almost always an increase of activity, and it was about equally frequent in MT and MST. A modulation of >50% was observed in ∼41% of MT neurons and 27% of MST neurons. Responses to all directions of motion were modulated so that the direction tuning curves in the attended and unattended conditions were similar. Changes in the background activity with target selection were small and unlikely to account for the observed attentional modulation. In contrast, there was little change in the neuronal response with attention when the stimulus reached the RF center 150 ms after motion onset, which was also the condition in which the vector average model better predicted the initial eye movements and the activity of the neurons. These results are consistent with a competition model of attention in which top-down attention acts on the activity of one of two competing populations of neurons activated by the bottom-up input from peripheral stimuli. They suggest that there is a minimal separation of the populations necessary before attention can act on one population, similar to that required to produce a winner-take-all mode of behavior in pursuit initiation. The present experiments also suggest that it takes several hundred milliseconds to develop this top-down attention effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document