Srpska politička misao: Posebno izdanje [special issue] (Edited by Đorđe Stojanović and Dušan Pavlović); Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, 2014.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-183
Author(s):  
Mladen Lišanin
Politics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026339572110502
Author(s):  
Sophia Hatzisavvidou ◽  
James Martin

This article introduces the special issue on Rhetorical Approaches to Contemporary Political Studies. It underscores the importance of innovations in political speech as a key to the continuing attraction of scholars to rhetorical methods. This is particularly relevant at a moment of crisis and disruption in established democracies when the parameters of acceptable discourse have been brought into question by forms of ‘post-truth’ politics. Although controversial, such efforts affirm the value of rhetorical analysis as a mode of political enquiry. The article then sketches the arguments of the contributions to the issue.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-289
Author(s):  
KEISUKE IIDA

AbstractThis article summarizes the findings of this special issue focusing on five questions: (1) who studies Japanese politics and international relations in China, Japan and the Republic of Korea?; (2) what is being studied in each of these countries?; 3) how are Japanese politics studied in each of these countries?; (3) what determines the nature of the study of Japanese politics and international relations?; and 4) what is the impact of the study of Japanese politics in each of these three countries? The findings on the first questions are that most scholars in each of these countries are concentrated in their forties and fifties, but their educational backgrounds are considerably varied. On the second question, the topics of study are becoming more wide-ranging in recent years, although in China, government policy still puts a constraint on the range of topics studied. Regarding the third question, the approaches that are used are becoming more varied, especially in Japan and South Korea. Concerning the fourth question, domestic politics in each of these countries matter, and financial constraints are a problem in China. Finally, it seems that Korean scholars in this area may have greater impact on the government than in the other two countries.


Author(s):  
Oscar Berglund ◽  
Claire A. Dunlop ◽  
Christopher M. Weible

This Special Issue makes a statement about the study of policy and politics, where it has been, how it is done, what it is, and where it is going. When addressing the question ‘who gets to speak for our discipline?’ we respond emphatically – many people, from many places, working in many ways. It comprises scholarship that has rarely been combined to explore some cardinal challenges about our scholarship: (1) How do we conceive of policy and political studies? (2) To what extent should our science be ‘normative’ or ‘objective’ or ‘positive’? (3) Who are our audiences, and how do we engage them? (4) Whose knowledge matters, and how does it accumulate? (5) How should we advance the study of policy and politics? We conclude charging the field to consider different ways of thinking about what we can discover and construct in the world and how we can conduct our science.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 775-775
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1155-1156
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-337
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Schneider
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document