scholarly journals Review of safety of single stage bilateral total knee replacement with cruciate retaining prosthesis and subvastus approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 933-940
Author(s):  
Dr. James C George ◽  
Dr. Jishar Sainulabdeen ◽  
Dr. Samuel Chittaranjan ◽  
Dr. Koshy George ◽  
Dr. Ajith Thomas Abraham
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnamoorthy Shriram ◽  
A.B. Govindaraj ◽  
A.N. Vivek ◽  
Sohanlal VijayKumar ◽  
M. Anand

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
pp. 1199-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoann Lévy ◽  
Michel Azar ◽  
Laurie Tran ◽  
Pascal Boileau ◽  
Nicolas Bronsard ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96-B (6) ◽  
pp. 752-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. H. Scott ◽  
R. C. Murray ◽  
D. J. MacDonald ◽  
L. C. Biant

Author(s):  
John Goodfellow ◽  
John O'Connor ◽  
Hemant Pandit ◽  
Christopher Dodd ◽  
David Murray

Having demonstrated in Chapter 2 that a fully conforming mobile bearing can minimise polyethylene wear, in this chapter we show that a mobile bearing prosthesis, unconstrained in the sagittal plane, can restore natural mobility and stability. For surgeon readers who are less interested in the theoretical background, it might be advisable to go straight to Chapter 4, Indications, or to start by reading the final section of this chapter, The Loaded Prosthetic Knee. If that proves interesting, the surgeon might attempt The Unloaded Prosthetic Knee. For the more research minded surgeon or engineer, it seems more logical to start with the Unloaded Natural Knee (the longest section of the chapter) and to read from there. The chapter may also be of interest to those surgeons embarking on the use of a bi-cruciate retaining total knee replacement.


1985 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Soudry ◽  
R Binazzi ◽  
J N Insall ◽  
T J Nordstrom ◽  
P M Pellicci ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document