scholarly journals Selective nerve root block in lumbar radiculopathy in lumbar disc prolapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-559
Author(s):  
Dr. Gururaja Meravanigi ◽  
Dr. Anilkumar T Bennur
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Raj Dhakal ◽  
Pawan Kumar Hamal ◽  
Siddhartha Dhungana ◽  
Yoshiharu Kawaguchi

Background: Selective Nerve Root Block using steroid is a proven technique for management of lumbar radiculopathy. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of selective nerve root block in lumbar radiculopathy.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for duration of one year in patients diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy. Patients with leg pain, positive straight leg raising test and single level disc prolapse were included in the study. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance and Visual Analogue Pain rating scale and Oswestry Disability Index score was used for assessment pre-injection, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1-year post injection.Results: Total 35 patient with mean age of 37.7± 9.31 years were included in the study. The pre-injection Visual Analogue Pain Score(Mean ± S.D:7.8±0.7) was significantly reduced at one week (4.2±1.47, p <0.00001), one month (2.74±1.06, p <0.00001), six months (2.31±0.75, p <0.00001) and one year (2.62±0.84, p <0.00001). Similarly, pre-injection Oswestry Disability Index score (Mean ± S.D: 32.09±5.95) was significantly reduced at one week (19.51±7.26, p <0.00001), one month (12.71±4.56, p <0.00001), six months (9.8±2.87, p <0.00001) and one year (10.09±2.97, p <0.00001) but not significantly improved when compared at 6 months and 1 year (p < 0.44).Conclusions: Selective Nerve Root Block in lumbar radiculopathy significantly reduces Visual Analogue Pain Score up to a year, however, the reduction in pain plateaus around six months.Disability index score only reduces for first 6 months but doesn’t significantly reduce from six months to one year.Keywords: Lumbar; radiculopathy; selective nerve root block; steroid.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Ho Lee ◽  
Sung Ho Hahn ◽  
Bo Kyu Yang ◽  
Seung Rim Yi ◽  
Shun Wook Chung ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-531
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Takahashi ◽  
Akira Fukushima ◽  
Noriyuki Takasu ◽  
Atsushi Yamamoto ◽  
Tomofumi Ogoshi

2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
Tomonao Chikama ◽  
Ko Ikuta ◽  
Nobuhiko Yokoyama ◽  
Yusuke Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Kitamura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-154
Author(s):  
Vihar SJ ◽  
Naveen DS ◽  
Agrawal NK

Lower back pain with radiculopathy is one of the common complaints that patient presents to an orthopaedician. Study was done to assess effect of extraforaminal Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) in management of lumbar radiculopathy in 50 patients between December 2019 and June 2020 at Bapuji Medical College and Chigateri General Hospital, Davanagere, Karnataka, India. Extraforaminal SNRB was performed and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores recorded pre procedure, immediate post procedure, one month and 6 months post procedure. Significant decrease (p<0.001) in VAS scores immediate post procedure by 5 or more points in 25%; by 3-4 points in 44% and 1-2 points in 6% of the patients obtained. One month post procedure showed statistically significant results (p<0.005) owing to change in VAS score by 1-2 points in 84% (42) patients and no change or increase in the VAS scores only in 10%(5) patients. VAS scores at 6th month showed statistically significant results (p<0.005) with reduction of VAS scores in 46.34% (19), retention of VAS score 0 in 31.70% (13) and no change or increase in VAS scores in only 21.95% (9) patients. Our study concludes that extraforaminal SNRB acts as excellent diagnostic tool and therapeutic modality for immediate and long term pain management in lumbar radiculopathy. Increase in the pain scores at 6th month (p=0.2) shows that recurrence of symptoms is a possibility. Further randomized control studies with larger study population, association of patient factors affecting extraforaminal SNRB would give better insight and knowledge of the factual data.


2007 ◽  
Vol 3;10 (5;3) ◽  
pp. 461-466
Author(s):  
Dmitri Vassiliev

Background: Lumbar selective nerve root blocks have been performed to establish the origin of lumbar radiculopathy in clinically difficult cases. The diagnostic ability of selective nerve root blocks remains controversial because of concern over potential spread of an injectate onto adjacent structures. Objective: To investigate the spread of different volumes of water-soluble contrast during L4 and L5 selective nerve root blocks. Design: Retrospective, observational case series. Methods: Analysis of medical records and X-ray images obtained during L4 and L5 selective nerve root blocks. Results: During L4 selective nerve root block 1 ml of contrast spread onto L5 nerve roots in 46.1% of subjects and during L5 nerve root block 1 ml of contrast spread onto S1 nerve root in 57.7%. There was statistically significant difference (p<0.0001) between spread of contrast onto the medially located nerve root in the same lumbar segment and nerve roots in the lumbar segment above. Conclusions: Injection of 1 ml of contrast under fluoroscopic guidance does not guarantee selective spread of the contrast around L4 or L5 nerve roots only. There is also spread toward the more medial nerve root in the same spinal segment during L4 and L5 nerve root infiltration. These findings suggest that it is possible to differentiate between L4 and L5 nerve root pathology using a sequential nerve root blocks under fluoroscopic guidance. Key words: Selective nerve root block, Lumbar radiculopathy, Fluoroscopic guidance


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document