scholarly journals Frame dependence of transition form factors in light-front dynamics

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meijian Li
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meijian Li ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Pieter Maris ◽  
James P. Vary

2003 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard L. G. Bakker ◽  
Ho-Meoyng Choi ◽  
Chueng-Ryong Ji

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Pieter Maris ◽  
James P. Vary

Author(s):  
O. M. A. LEITNER ◽  
B. EL-BENNICH ◽  
B. LOISEAU ◽  
J. P. DEDONDER

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 1460047
Author(s):  
CHUENG-RYONG JI

Among the three forms of relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics proposed by Dirac in 1949, the front form has the largest number of kinematic generators. This distinction provides useful consequences in the analysis of physical observables in hadron physics. We discuss a rationale for using the front form dynamics, known nowadays as the light-front dynamics (LFD), and present a few explicit examples of hadron phenomenology that the front form uniquely can offer from the first principle QCD. In particular, model independent constraints are provided for the analyses of deuteron form factors and the NΔ transition form factors at large momentum transfer square Q2.


2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Kuo Hsiao ◽  
Ling Yang ◽  
Chong-Chung Lih ◽  
Shang-Yuu Tsai

AbstractMore than ten $$\Omega _c^0$$ Ω c 0 weak decay modes have been measured with the branching fractions relative to that of $$\Omega ^0_c\rightarrow \Omega ^-\pi ^+$$ Ω c 0 → Ω - π + . In order to extract the absolute branching fractions, the study of $$\Omega ^0_c\rightarrow \Omega ^-\pi ^+$$ Ω c 0 → Ω - π + is needed. In this work, we predict $${{\mathcal {B}}}_\pi \equiv {{\mathcal {B}}}(\Omega _c^0\rightarrow \Omega ^-\pi ^+)=(5.1\pm 0.7)\times 10^{-3}$$ B π ≡ B ( Ω c 0 → Ω - π + ) = ( 5.1 ± 0.7 ) × 10 - 3 with the $$\Omega _c^0\rightarrow \Omega ^-$$ Ω c 0 → Ω - transition form factors calculated in the light-front quark model. We also predict $${{\mathcal {B}}}_\rho \equiv {{\mathcal {B}}}(\Omega _c^0\rightarrow \Omega ^-\rho ^+)=(14.4\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-3}$$ B ρ ≡ B ( Ω c 0 → Ω - ρ + ) = ( 14.4 ± 0.4 ) × 10 - 3 and $${{\mathcal {B}}}_e\equiv {{\mathcal {B}}}(\Omega _c^0\rightarrow \Omega ^-e^+\nu _e)=(5.4\pm 0.2)\times 10^{-3}$$ B e ≡ B ( Ω c 0 → Ω - e + ν e ) = ( 5.4 ± 0.2 ) × 10 - 3 . The previous values for $${{\mathcal {B}}}_\rho /{{\mathcal {B}}}_\pi $$ B ρ / B π have been found to deviate from the most recent observation. Nonetheless, our $${{\mathcal {B}}}_\rho /{{\mathcal {B}}}_\pi =2.8\pm 0.4$$ B ρ / B π = 2.8 ± 0.4 is able to alleviate the deviation. Moreover, we obtain $${{\mathcal {B}}}_e/{{\mathcal {B}}}_\pi =1.1\pm 0.2$$ B e / B π = 1.1 ± 0.2 , which is consistent with the current data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document