scholarly journals State of the Art: Evaluation and Management of Patients with Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma

Author(s):  
John Waters ◽  
Neelan Doolabh ◽  
Michael Jessen

Objective: To review the current literature on the state of the art of evaluation and management of cardiac papillary fibroelastoma (PFE). Methods: A literature review was performed on the topic of evaluation and management of PFE. PubWeb, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus search engines were used. Key search terms included: “Cardiac papillary fibroelastoma,” “papillary fibroelastoma,” “Surgical resection of papillary fibroelastoma,” “Minimally invasive resection of papillary fibroelastoma,” “Thoracoscopy and PFE.” Relevant articles were archived and synthesized in an EndNote database. Particular attention was focused on identifying cases of minimally invasive resection of PFE and the use of thoracoscopic adjuncts to assist with cavitary PFE removal. Institutional Review Board approval was waived. Results: A total of 119 articles were identified and archived. Forty seven articles were used to compose this paper. 8 articles detailed minimally invasive resection of PFE. The largest series of minimally invasive PFE resection summed 4 patients. There are currently no guidelines to direct care of patients with PFE. General consensus is that the presence of left sided PFE should prompt evaluation for surgery. Conclusions: PFE is a rare tumor, more common in children than adults. Lesions are typically left sided and are at risk for embolization. Minimally invasive surgery is feasible and safe. Long-term outcomes with complete resection are very good.

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirhasan Rahimli ◽  
Aristotelis Perrakis ◽  
Vera Schellerer ◽  
Andrew Gumbs ◽  
Eric Lorenz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.


2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Kelley ◽  
Zachary Klaassen ◽  
Cormac E. O'Neill ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Patrick J. Fox ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
BrianK. P. Goh ◽  
Madeline Chee ◽  
Chuan-Yaw Lee ◽  
Ser-Yee Lee ◽  
LondonL. P. J. Ooi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mehmet Salih Boga ◽  
Mehmet Giray Sönmez ◽  
Kaan Karamık ◽  
Çağatay Özsoy ◽  
Arif Aydın ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document