Etheostoma flabellare: NatureServe

Author(s):  
1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 2910-2916 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lyons

Since 1900, major changes have occurred in the assemblage of small littoral-zone fishes (maximum total length < 150 mm; usually encountered in the nearshore area) that inhabits Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. A diverse assemblage that included several environmentally sensitive species has been replaced by an assemblage dominated by a single species, the brook silverside (Labidesthes sicculus), whose abundance fluctuates dramatically from year to year. Between 1900 and 1981, eight species, the pugnose shiner (Notropis anogenus), common shiner (Notropis cornutus), blackchin shiner (Notropis heterodon), blacknose shiner (Notropis heterolepis), tadpole madtom (Noturus gyrinus), banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus), blackstripe topminnow (Fundulus notatus), and fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare), disappeared from the lake. The blackchin shiner and banded killifish were the most abundant small littoral-zone species in 1914–1916, and remained common until the late 1960's. Their decline was associated with the invasion and explosive increase in abundance of an exotic macrophyte, the Eurasian water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), in the mid-1960's. The decline and disappearance of the blackchin shiner and banded killifish in three other Wisconsin lakes was also associated with the invasion of Eurasian water milfoil. Changes in the assemblage of small littoral-zone fishes in Lake Mendota indicate environmental degradation in the nearshore area, and may have important implications for the entire fish community of the lake.


1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 1629-1633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihor Hlohowskyj ◽  
Thomas E. Wissing

Seasonal critical thermal maxima (CTMax) were determined for greenside (Etheostoma blennioides), fantail (Etheostoma flabellare), and rainbow (Etheostoma caeruleum) darters. Mean CTMax values for field-acclimatized greenside darters ranged from 26.2 °C in March to 35.1 °C in September. The values for fantail and rainbow darters were 30.8–36.0 °C (March–July) and 30.0–36.4 °C (April–July), respectively. CTMax values for the three species were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with field water temperature (greenside darter, r = 0.970; rainbow darter, r = 0.964; fantail darter, r = 0.968). Fish acclimated at 10 and 20 °C in the laboratory exhibited significant seasonal changes in CTMax, with the highest values occurring in the summer. Except for fantail darters tested in summer, the three species showed significant relationships between CTMax and acclimation temperature. Seasonal differences were also observed in the slopes of the relationships between CTMax and acclimation temperature. The highest slopes occurred in spring, autumn, or both. Differences in the tolerance of darters to high temperatures and adjustment of tolerance to high temperature may influence their distributions in streams.


Behaviour ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (11) ◽  
pp. 1255-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel L. Moran ◽  
Carl N. von Ende ◽  
Bethia H. King

Mate choice copying is a form of social learning that is defined as the increased likelihood of an individual choosing a particular mate after observing another individual choosing that mate. Mate choice copying has been demonstrated in a range of taxonomic groups, but not usually for both sexes. Mate choice copying experiments were performed here using two congeneric sympatric darters, Etheostoma flabellare and E. zonale. In E. flabellare, males guard a nest site under a rock and care for developing eggs. In E. zonale, eggs are attached to filamentous green algae and neither sex provides parental care. Our results provide the first evidence that mate choice copying occurs in darters. Previously it was hypothesised that copying might be more common in species and sexes that provide parental care, the reasoning being that the costs of choosing poorly may be higher. However, mate choice copying was found in both sexes of E. zonale (no parental care) and in male but not female E. flabellare (male only parental care). Thus, the only group that did not mate choice copy was the one whose mate would be providing care, and even E. flabellare females copy the mate choice of other females by some definitions. The relationship, if any, between which sex provides parental care and whether copying occurs remains unclear, and the number of species for which such data are available is limited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document