Timo Joutsivuo, Scholastic Tradition and Humanist Innovation: The Concept of the Neutrum in Renaissance Medicine. (Humaniora series, 303.) Helsinki: The Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, 1999. 288 pp. n.p. ISBN: 951-41-0863-9. - Antonella Del Prete, Bruno, l'infini et les mondes. (Philosophies Series.) Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999. n.p. ISBN: 2-13-049869-8.

2001 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 296-298
Author(s):  
Helen S. Lang
2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 795
Author(s):  
Daniel Brownstein ◽  
Timo Joutsivuo

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Clucas

The Animadversiones in Elementorum Philosophiae by a little known Flemish scholar G. Moranus, published in Brussels in 1655 was an early European response to Hobbes’s De Corpore. Although it is has been referred to by various Hobbes scholars, such as Noel Malcolm, Doug Jesseph, and Alexander Bird it has been little studied. Previous scholarship has tended to focus on the mathematical criticisms of André Tacquet which Moranus included in the form of a letter in his volume. Moranus’s philosophical objections to Hobbes’s natural philosophy offer a fascinating picture of the critical reception of Hobbes’s work by a religious writer trained in the late Scholastic tradition. Moranus’s opening criticism clearly shows that he is unhappy with Hobbes’s exclusion of the divine and the immaterial from natural philosophy. He asks what authority Hobbes has for breaking with the common understanding of philosophy, as defined by Cicero ‘the knowledge of things human and divine’. He also offers natural philosophical and theological criticisms of Hobbes for overlooking the generation of things involved in the Creation. He also attacks the natural philosophical underpinning of Hobbes’s civil philosophy. In this paper I look at a number of philosophical topics which Moranus criticised in Hobbes’s work, including his mechanical psychology, his theory of imaginary space, his use of the concept of accidents, his blurring of the distinction between the human being and the animal, and his theories of motion. Moranus’s criticisms, which are a mixture of philosophical and theological objections, gives us some clear indications of what made Hobbes’ natural philosophy controversial amongst his contemporaries, and sheds new light on the early continental reception of Hobbes’s work.


Ambix ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Secret
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
William Lamb

This chapter sets the making of commentaries on John’s Gospel, particularly within the Greek tradition, in the context of ancient Greek scholarship and the emergence of a scholastic tradition within the early Church. These commentaries drew on established philological conventions in order to clarify ambiguities and complexities within the text. At the same time, they served to amplify the meaning of the text in the face of new questions, controversies and preoccupations. Commentators used John’s Gospel ‘to think with’. With its allusive prose and symbolic discourse, the Fourth Gospel provoked commentators to respond to on-going doctrinal debate and to work out wider questions about Christian doctrine and identity.


Author(s):  
Yohei Kikuchihara ◽  
Hiro Hirai
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document