Labor Law: Labor-Management Relations Act: Availability of Injunctive Relief under Section 301

George B. Berridge

doi:10.2307/1284996

Labor Law: Labor-Management Relations Act: Availability of Injunctive Relief under Section 301

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1284996 ◽

1954 ◽

Vol 52 (3) ◽

pp. 455

Author(s):

George B. Berridge

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Injunctive Relief ◽

Section 301

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Section 301 (a) Gives Federal Courts Jurisdiction over Suit by Union for Enforcement of Award Made in Arbitration Pursuant to Collective-Bargaining Agreement. Textile Workers v. Cone Mills Corp. (4th Cir. 1959)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1337992 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 73 (7) ◽

pp. 1408

Keyword(s):

Collective Bargaining ◽

Labor Law ◽

Federal Courts ◽

Collective Bargaining Agreement ◽

Textile Workers ◽

Labor Management ◽

Made In ◽

Section 301

Labor Law: Removal of Suits for Injunctive Relief under Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act

Columbia Law Review ◽

10.2307/1120752 ◽

1965 ◽

Vol 65 (5) ◽

pp. 907

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Injunctive Relief ◽

Section 301

Labor Law: Labor-Management Relations Act: Right of Union to Sue on Collective Agreement under Section 301

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1285450 ◽

1954 ◽

Vol 53 (1) ◽

pp. 154

Author(s):

Robert C. Fox

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Collective Agreement ◽

Labor Management ◽

Section 301

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act, 1947. District Courts Held Injunctive Relief Available to Private Litigants under Taft-Hartley Act

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1336155 ◽

1948 ◽

Vol 61 (6) ◽

pp. 1068

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

District Courts ◽

Labor Management ◽

Injunctive Relief

Labor Law. Labor-Management Relations Act. Exemplary Damages May Be Awarded in Action under Section 301. Sidney Wanzer & Sons, Inc. v. Milk Drivers Union, 249 F. Supp. 664 (N. D. Ill. 1966)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1339389 ◽

1967 ◽

Vol 80 (4) ◽

pp. 903

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Section 301

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Nonpayment of Salaries under Collective Agreement Not Basis for Jurisdiction over Suit by Union under Section 301 (a)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1336809 ◽

1954 ◽

Vol 67 (8) ◽

pp. 1430

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Collective Agreement ◽

Labor Management ◽

Section 301

Labor Law: Arbitration: Determination of the Question of Arbitrability under Section 301 (a) of Labor-Management Relations Act

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1286315 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 58 (6) ◽

pp. 935

Author(s):

Cecil R. Mellin

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Section 301

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. State Court Can Issue an Injunction under Section 301 to Enforce a No-Strike Clause in a Collective-Bargaining Agreement. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County Dist. Council of Carpenters (Cal. 1957)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1338109 ◽

1958 ◽

Vol 71 (6) ◽

pp. 1172

Keyword(s):

Los Angeles ◽

Collective Bargaining ◽

Los Angeles County ◽

Labor Law ◽

Collective Bargaining Agreement ◽

State Court ◽

Labor Management ◽

Section 301

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Federal Court Has No General Equity Jurisdiction over Administration of Union Welfare Funds. Moses v. Ammond (S. D. N. Y. 1958)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1338310 ◽

1959 ◽

Vol 72 (4) ◽

pp. 778

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Federal Court ◽

Labor Management

Limitations Placed upon NLRB's Use of Dues Reimbursement Orders: Labor Law. Labor Management Relations. Brown-Olds Remedy

Stanford Law Review ◽

10.2307/1226889 ◽

1961 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 401

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management