Federal Civil Procedure: Federal Rule 12(e): Motion for More Definite Statement: History, Operation and Efficacy

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1286825 ◽

1963 ◽

Vol 61 (6) ◽

pp. 1126

Author(s):

Stefan F. Tucker

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Definite Statement ◽

Download Full-text

A Formulaic Recitation Will Not Do: Why, as a Matter of Law, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c) Should Be Interpreted to Be at Least as Stringent as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.3588398 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Charles Hintz

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Civil Procedure ◽

Download Full-text

Interpleading Plaintiff Held Not Adverse to Defendant-Claimant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33

Columbia Law Review ◽

10.2307/1120191 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 60 (6) ◽

pp. 882 ◽

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Download Full-text

Civil Procedure. Petition for Rehearing as a Motion for New Trial under Federal Rule 59

Columbia Law Review ◽

10.2307/1117647 ◽

1944 ◽

Vol 44 (1) ◽

pp. 84

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Download Full-text

A Brief Review on the Restriction of Maritime Attachment: Focusing on the U.S. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Supplemental Admiralty Rule B

Korean Lawyers Association Journal ◽

10.17007/klaj.2010.59.9.004 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 59 (9) ◽

pp. 152-198

Author(s):

김종호

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

The U.S ◽

Download Full-text

DUE PROCESS CONSTRAINTS ON CLASS ACTIONS: FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23

American Business Law Journal ◽

10.1111/j.1744-1714.1976.tb00444.x ◽

1976 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 111-115

Author(s):

Bill Shaw

Keyword(s):

Due Process ◽

Civil Procedure ◽

Class Actions ◽

Process Constraints ◽

Download Full-text

Federal Courts. Rules of Civil Procedure. Federal Rule 25 (a) (1) Held Invalid for Abridging Substantive Rights

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1337606 ◽

1957 ◽

Vol 70 (8) ◽

pp. 1471

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Federal Courts ◽

Download Full-text

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b): Standards for Relief from Judgments Due to Changes in Law

The University of Chicago Law Review ◽

10.2307/1599235 ◽

1976 ◽

Vol 43 (3) ◽

pp. 646

Author(s):

Richard M. Lipton

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Download Full-text

Substitution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d): Mootness and Related Problems

The University of Chicago Law Review ◽

10.2307/1599195 ◽

1975 ◽

Vol 43 (1) ◽

pp. 192

Author(s):

Arthur F. Sampson III

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Download Full-text

Federal Courts: Final Decision: Appealability of Multiple Claims: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 (b)

California Law Review ◽

10.2307/3478299 ◽

1956 ◽

Vol 44 (5) ◽

pp. 952

Author(s):

Georg Geiger

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Federal Courts ◽

Final Decision ◽

Download Full-text

Federal Civil Procedure: Judgments: Use of Federal Rule 60 (b) (6) to Adjust Forfeitures Downward

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1285831 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 58 (5) ◽

pp. 793

Author(s):

Cecil R. Mellin

Keyword(s):

Civil Procedure ◽

Download Full-text