Observations on the Indeterminacy of the Sample Correlation Coefficient

2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen Byer
Biometrika ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 654-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
SADANORI KONISHI

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Knapp

This paper is an attempt to illustrate the generality of incidence sampling for estimating a parameter whose estimator preserves the unbiasedness of generalized symmetric means, a property which the sample covariance possesses but which the sample correlation coefficient does not. The problem of missing data is also addressed.


1992 ◽  
pp. 466-469
Author(s):  
N. N. Mikhail ◽  
F. A. Chimenti ◽  
J. D. Kidder

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Ginker ◽  
Offer Lieberman

Summary It is well known that the sample correlation coefficient between many financial return indices exhibits substantial variation on any reasonable sampling window. This stylised fact contradicts a unit root model for the underlying processes in levels, as the statistic converges in probability to a constant under this modeling scheme. In this paper, we establish asymptotic theory for regression in local stochastic unit root (LSTUR) variables. An empirical application reveals that the new theory explains very well the instability, in both sign and scale, of the sample correlation coefficient between gold, oil, and stock return price indices. In addition, we establish spurious regression theory for LSTUR variables, which generalises the results known hitherto, as well as a theory for balanced regression in this setting.


2000 ◽  
Vol 87 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1101-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Berry ◽  
Paul W. Mielke

The Fisher transformation of the sample correlation coefficient r (1915, 1921) and two related techniques by Gayen (1951) and Jeyaratnam (1992) are examined for robustness to nonnormality. Monte Carlo analyses compare combinations of sample sizes and population parameters for seven bivariate distributions. The Fisher, Gayen, and Jeyaratnam approaches are shown to provide useful results for a bivariate normal distribution with any population correlation coefficient ρ and for nonnormal bivariate distributions when ρ = 0. In contrast, the techniques are virtually useless for nonnormal bivariate distributions when ρ#0.0. Surprisingly, small samples are found to provide better estimates than large samples for skewed and symmetric heavy-tailed bivariate distributions.


Author(s):  
Suma AP ◽  
KP Suresh

In a bivariate or a multivariate data, to understand the association between the variables Correlation is the best tool. It gives the degree of relationship between the variables. Regression gives the exact linear relationship between the variables. This article gives details of capabilities of Vassarstats Correlation and Regression and procedure to calculate Correlation coefficient and Regression coefficients with examples. Vassarstats Correlation and Regression can perform Linear Correlation and Regression, Intercorrelations, Multiple Correlation and Regression, Partial Correlation, 0.95 and 0.99 Confidence intervals for population correlation coefficient, Estimating the Population Value of rho, Significance of value of r, Significance of difference between two correlation coefficients, Significance of difference between sample correlation coefficient and hypothetical value of population Correlation coefficient, Rank Order Correlation, Correlation coefficient for a 2*2 contingency table, Point biserial correlation coefficient, Correlation for unordered pairs, and then Simple Logistic Regression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document