History of Black Americans: From the Compromise of 1850 to the End of the Civil War

1984 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 396
Author(s):  
James M. McPherson ◽  
Philip S. Foner
Keyword(s):  
1984 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 648
Author(s):  
Arvarh E. Strickland ◽  
Philip S. Foner
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Austin Graham

Abstract “The Unacknowledged War” is an inquiry into the phenomenon of Civil War revisionism, focusing on the tendency of white Americans to deny, against all available evidence, that the “war between the states” was waged over slavery. In doing so, the essay turns to Paul Laurence Dunbar’s grievously understudied 1901 novel The Fanatics, a historical fiction of the war years that focuses on the white North and argues that the Unionists who battled the Confederacy did so only because they wrongly believed that the war’s purpose had nothing to do with enslaved Black Americans. The essay also shows how Dunbar’s novel contributes to several fields of contemporary intellectual interest, among them Civil War studies, Afropessimist thought, and a cross-disciplinary investigation of negative epistemologies known as “ignorance studies.” Ultimately, the essay concludes that Civil War revisionism has yet to show signs of ebbing in American historical consciousness and that ignorance-oriented novels like Dunbar’s are indispensable partners for approaching this persistent problem.


1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
Robert C. Detweiler ◽  
Philip S. Foner
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
pp. 142-157
Author(s):  
M. Voeikov ◽  
S. Dzarasov

The paper written in the light of 125th birth anniversary of L. Trotsky analyzes the life and ideas of one of the most prominent figures in the Russian history of the 20th century. He was one of the leaders of the Russian revolution in its Bolshevik period, worked with V. Lenin and played a significant role in the Civil War. Rejected by the party bureaucracy L. Trotsky led uncompromising struggle against Stalinism, defending his own understanding of the revolutionary ideals. The authors try to explain these events in historical perspective, avoiding biases of both Stalinism and anticommunism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document