Predation Risk and Competition Affect Habitat Selection and Activity of Namib Desert Gerbils

Ecology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 1397-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica J. Hughes ◽  
David Ward ◽  
Michael R. Perrin
1993 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1243-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica J. Hughes ◽  
David Ward

2022 ◽  
Vol 547 ◽  
pp. 151679
Author(s):  
Linae Boehme-Terrana ◽  
Michelle Roux-Osovitz ◽  
Erin Goergen ◽  
Harrison Mancke ◽  
Samantha Fisher ◽  
...  

Ecology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 2480-2490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Fortin ◽  
Marie-Eve Fortin ◽  
Hawthorne L. Beyer ◽  
Thierry Duchesne ◽  
Sabrina Courant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
R.J. Belanger ◽  
M.A. Edwards ◽  
L.N. Carbyn ◽  
S.E. Nielsen

Habitat selection is a behavioural process that ultimately affects animal fitness. Forage availability and predation risk are often studied in the context of habitat selection for large ungulates, while other biological and environmental factors such as insect harassment and footing are less studied. Here we examine trade-offs in summer habitat selection between forage availability for wood bison (Bison bison athabascae Rhoads, 1898) with that of biting-fly harassment and soil firmness, which affects activity budgets and predation risk, respectively, and contrast this to winter when flies are absent and soils frozen. Using path analysis, we demonstrate that graminoid availability was not related to habitat selection in summer, but was positively related to habitat selection in winter. Habitat selection in summer was negatively related to biting-fly abundance and positively related to firmer footing. Our results suggest that bison observe trade-offs in summer between maximizing forage intake and minimizing harassment from that of biting flies, while avoiding areas of soft substrates that affect locomotion and vulnerability to predators. In contrast, during the winter, bison focus on areas with greater graminoid availability. Although forage is a key aspect of habitat selection, our results illustrate the importance of considering direct and indirect effects of multiple biological and environmental factors related to ungulate habitat selection.


Oikos ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Lone ◽  
Atle Mysterud ◽  
Terje Gobakken ◽  
John Odden ◽  
John Linnell ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrew S. Jones ◽  
Esther S. Rubin ◽  
Matthew J. Clement ◽  
Larisa E. Harding ◽  
Jacob I. Mesler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document