Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Selection by Water Column Fish, Benthic Fish and Crayfish in Stream Pools

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 527 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Magoulick
2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 986-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
KARL M. POLIVKA ◽  
LISA M. FRIEDLI ◽  
ELIZABETH C. GREEN

Polar Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen L. David ◽  
Fokje L. Schaafsma ◽  
Jan A. van Franeker ◽  
Evgeny A. Pakhomov ◽  
Brian P. V. Hunt ◽  
...  

AbstractSurvival of larval Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) during winter is largely dependent upon the presence of sea ice as it provides an important source of food and shelter. We hypothesized that sea ice provides additional benefits because it hosts fewer competitors and provides reduced predation risk for krill larvae than the water column. To test our hypothesis, zooplankton were sampled in the Weddell-Scotia Confluence Zone at the ice-water interface (0–2 m) and in the water column (0–500 m) during August–October 2013. Grazing by mesozooplankton, expressed as a percentage of the phytoplankton standing stock, was higher in the water column (1.97 ± 1.84%) than at the ice-water interface (0.08 ± 0.09%), due to a high abundance of pelagic copepods. Predation risk by carnivorous macrozooplankton, expressed as a percentage of the mesozooplankton standing stock, was significantly lower at the ice-water interface (0.83 ± 0.57%; main predators amphipods, siphonophores and ctenophores) than in the water column (4.72 ± 5.85%; main predators chaetognaths and medusae). These results emphasize the important role of sea ice as a suitable winter habitat for larval krill with fewer competitors and lower predation risk. These benefits should be taken into account when considering the response of Antarctic krill to projected declines in sea ice. Whether reduced sea-ice algal production may be compensated for by increased water column production remains unclear, but the shelter provided by sea ice would be significantly reduced or disappear, thus increasing the predation risk on krill larvae.


Ecology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 1397-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica J. Hughes ◽  
David Ward ◽  
Michael R. Perrin

2022 ◽  
Vol 547 ◽  
pp. 151679
Author(s):  
Linae Boehme-Terrana ◽  
Michelle Roux-Osovitz ◽  
Erin Goergen ◽  
Harrison Mancke ◽  
Samantha Fisher ◽  
...  

Ecology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 2480-2490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Fortin ◽  
Marie-Eve Fortin ◽  
Hawthorne L. Beyer ◽  
Thierry Duchesne ◽  
Sabrina Courant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
R.J. Belanger ◽  
M.A. Edwards ◽  
L.N. Carbyn ◽  
S.E. Nielsen

Habitat selection is a behavioural process that ultimately affects animal fitness. Forage availability and predation risk are often studied in the context of habitat selection for large ungulates, while other biological and environmental factors such as insect harassment and footing are less studied. Here we examine trade-offs in summer habitat selection between forage availability for wood bison (Bison bison athabascae Rhoads, 1898) with that of biting-fly harassment and soil firmness, which affects activity budgets and predation risk, respectively, and contrast this to winter when flies are absent and soils frozen. Using path analysis, we demonstrate that graminoid availability was not related to habitat selection in summer, but was positively related to habitat selection in winter. Habitat selection in summer was negatively related to biting-fly abundance and positively related to firmer footing. Our results suggest that bison observe trade-offs in summer between maximizing forage intake and minimizing harassment from that of biting flies, while avoiding areas of soft substrates that affect locomotion and vulnerability to predators. In contrast, during the winter, bison focus on areas with greater graminoid availability. Although forage is a key aspect of habitat selection, our results illustrate the importance of considering direct and indirect effects of multiple biological and environmental factors related to ungulate habitat selection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Clarke ◽  
Sasha K. Whitmarsh ◽  
Peter G. Fairweather ◽  
Charlie Huveneers

Baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) are increasing in popularity as non-invasive and fishery-independent tools for assessing fish assemblages. Although most BRUVS studies have focused on benthic fish communities, recent studies also use BRUVS to examine the comparatively undersampled pelagic communities. However, the propensities of benthic BRUVS to detect pelagic fishes and, likewise, pelagic BRUVS to detect demersal fishes are unknown. This study simultaneously used benthic and pelagic BRUVS deployed either separately (single) or in combination to determine assemblages of demersal and pelagic species at three contrasting sites within temperate South Australia. Assemblages observed by benthic v. pelagic BRUVS differed significantly at all sites, including one as shallow as 7m deep, but there were no significant differences in assemblages observed between BRUVS of the same position (i.e. pelagic or benthic) when BRUVS were deployed as single units or in combination. This study reveals the limitations of using only benthic or pelagic BRUVS, and highlights the necessity for both BRUVS positions to be used together to ensure that a comprehensive representation of entire fish assemblages throughout the water column can be obtained.


Oikos ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Lone ◽  
Atle Mysterud ◽  
Terje Gobakken ◽  
John Odden ◽  
John Linnell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document