The Application of Individual Differences Scaling to the Measurement of Political Ideologies

1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 405 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Marcus ◽  
David Tabb ◽  
John L. Sullivan
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.


Author(s):  
John C. Gower ◽  
Niël J. Le Roux ◽  
Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Garcı́a-Mira ◽  
Constantino Arce ◽  
José M. Sabucedo

Vegetatio ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari Oksanen ◽  
Pertti Huttunen

1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 823-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Q Hanham

An experiment conducted by Taylor and Parkes (1975) to investigate the factorial ecology of a city within a time—space framework is reexamined by means of an alternative method. The original experiment used common-factor analysis (a two-mode procedure) in a three-mode problem. Using the published data of this experiment, the new method, Individual Differences Scaling (INDSCAL), identifies two major dimensions and defines their importance for each of the time periods being considered. INDSCAL has a greater potential as such a method, since it is capable of analyzing problems of up to seven-mode in nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document