Women, Work and Protest: A Century of Women's Labor History

ILR Review ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Alice H. Cook ◽  
Ruth Milkman
Keyword(s):  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 602
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Blee ◽  
Ruth Milkman
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-383
Author(s):  
Ileen A. DeVault

Because the US Census Bureau changed the way they reported workers’ marital status, the subfield of US women's labor history unwittingly perpetuated a key misinterpretation of women's labor force participation, allowing historians to believe that women in the workforce between 1880 and 1920 were overwhelmingly young and single women: the daughters of their families rather than the mothers and wives. This change in census reporting was reinforced and promulgated by Joseph A. Hill's 1929 work, Women in Gainful Occupations, 1870–1920. Why was this change made? This article argues that this change came about because of a confluence of various factors, including the Census Bureau's continual struggles with organizational and technological changes, the beginning of World War I, and reformers’ arguments about the efficacy of pushing for maternity insurance for women workers. The story of this change once again reminds us that statistics are never neutral nor apolitical.


1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lois Rita Helmbold ◽  
Ann Schofield
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Eileen Boris ◽  
Lara Vapnek

Feminist struggles for better jobs and rights at work shaped women’s labor history, a project that proclaimed that the history of work and workers was incomplete without understanding the relationship between unpaid domestic labor and employment. Despite the uneven trajectory of women’s labor in a diverse nation, three major themes characterize the history of gender, work, and capitalist development. First, the persistent power of gender on the structure of work meant that employers and policymakers classified women’s labor as unskilled, supplemental, and an extension of women’s “natural” roles as wives and mothers. Second, women’s calls for dignity and improved wages and working conditions included ethnic associations, women’s clubs, and mixed-sex and women-only unions. Third, state policies offered some women protection but made few strides toward equity, which would require acknowledging women’s differential family responsibilities and establishing decent standards for all workers, including those employed in households and in agriculture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document