Parades and Power: Street Theatre in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Graham Hodges ◽  
Susan G. Davis
2020 ◽  
pp. 72-95
Author(s):  
David Faflik

This chapter addresses how the divergent city experience of the Paris métropole accumulated contrary meanings (overtly political in the minds of some, artfully performative in the minds of others) for interested onlookers during the tumultuous middle decades of the nineteenth century. The signature rhythms of the city’s divided politics in this period constituted a form unto themselves. For some observers of Paris, the distinguishing characteristic of these forms is that they were being placed under great strain by the domestic factions coalescing in France around a number of longstanding social grievances there, which together found expression in the country’s capital city. Another group of observers might have recognized the revolutionary potential of such grievances, but they were preoccupied instead by the captivating drama that was politics in Paris. These readers monitored the city’s politics less to understand its core issues than to enjoy what was effectively a form of street theatre for a viewing public. In the Paris of 1848, readers met with an urban “text” the content of which was sometimes indistinguishable from the enormity of its historical forms.


1989 ◽  
Vol 102 (405) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Rachelle H. Saltzman ◽  
Susan G. Davis

1967 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Richard Stoddard

The equipping of theaters with fire-prevention devices is generally considered to be a relatively recent concern. For example, Barnard Hewitt writes of the American theater: “No one concerned himself with prevention until Steele MacKaye made a nuisance of himself with buckets, hoses, and fireproofing of scenery.” It is true that the prevention of fires in theaters did not become a significant public issue until the latter half of the nineteenth century. MacKaye was responding to increased public concern for the safety of theatergoers. Fires in theaters were indeed tragically common during that century. Gas lighting created a considerable fire hazard, and after its introduction in the first quarter of the century the incidence of fires in theaters increased alarmingly.


PMLA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-273
Author(s):  
Sari Altschuler ◽  
Aaron M. Tobiason

On 11 november 1844, a Mob gathered outside philadelphia's chesnut street theatre for, in the words of the theater's manager, Francis Wemyss, the purpose “of a grand row” (395). The crowd intended to prevent the opening of The Quaker City; or, The Monks of Monk Hall, a play George Lippard had adapted from the work he was simultaneously publishing serially; it would become the best-selling novel of the first half of the nineteenth century. Capitalizing on a sensational 1843 murder case that fascinated Philadelphians, the novel retold the story of Singleton Mercer, a Philadelphia clerk acquitted of killing his sister's seducer. Infuriated by the playbill, Mercer attempted to purchase two hundred tickets for his supporters, who threatened to destroy the theater (Durang 247). Wemyss wanted Mercer jailed, but the mayor, wary of “riot and bloodshed,” countered, “I really think you have struck the first blow in your playbill” and called for the play's cancellation (qtd. in Wemyss 319-20). As the crowd of irate Philadelphians gathered, Lippard strode through it draped in an “ample cloak and carrying a sword-cane to repel assaults” (Bouton 20). Facing the very real prospect of violence, Wemyss reluctantly canceled the production.


1986 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 745
Author(s):  
Adrienne Siegel ◽  
Susan G. Davis

1987 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
John K. Alexander ◽  
Susan G. Davis

1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Bruce A. McConachie

Theatre historians have been kind to William B. Wood, actor and co-manager of the Chestnut Street Theatre in the early nineteenth century. Reese D. James, in his Old Drury of Philadelphia: A History of the Philadelphia Stage, 1800–1835 (1932), set the sentimental tone that subsequent historians would echo. Relying extensively on Wood's Personal Recollections of the Stage (1855), James lamented that the Chestnut Theatre, following the breakup of Warren and Woods' management in 1826, became “a body without a soul.” In his Theatre U.S.A. (1959), Barnard Hewitt quoted copiously from Wood's Recollections, allowing the co-manager the final word on the deleterious effects of the star system. Calvin Primer's two articles published in the 1960s on Warren and Wood continued the tradition, picturing both managers as the unfortunate victims of rapacious stars.


1988 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Chris Waters ◽  
Susan G. Davis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document