scholarly journals Understory Plant Response to Site Preparation and Fertilization of Loblolly and Shortleaf Pine Forests

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale G. Brockway ◽  
Gale L. Wolters ◽  
Henry A. Pearson ◽  
Ronald E. Thill ◽  
V. Clark Baldwin ◽  
...  
New Forests ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gwaze ◽  
Mark Johanson ◽  
Carl Hauser

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
David Clabo ◽  
Wayne Clatterbuck

Cluster planting of shortleaf pine, along with various site preparation and release treatments, were tested to restore mixed shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)–hardwood stands in areas where the shortleaf pine has diminished in recent years. Shortleaf pine–hardwood mixtures were once a common forest type throughout the Cumberland Mountains and Plateau physiographic regions of the southeastern United States. Knowledge of how to restore shortleaf pine–hardwood mixtures is limited throughout shortleaf pine’s large native range. The objectives of this study were to compare planted shortleaf pine and natural hardwood regeneration survival, growth, and composition following various site preparation and early release treatments. Cluster planting and partial timber harvesting were used to reintroduce shortleaf pine and create two-aged stands in the Cumberland Mountains of Tennessee, USA. Results indicated that shortleaf pine survival, basal diameter, and height growth did not differ following four growing seasons among treatments. Natural regeneration stem densities and heights within shortleaf pine clusters did not differ significantly by treatment. Natural regeneration stem densities differed by species group and height class across the site, while the treatment × species interaction term was also significant. At this early stage of stand development, the brown-and-burn treatment appears poised for greater shortleaf pine growth rates than the other treatments. The herbicide treatment had the fewest regenerating hardwoods per hectare and the most desirable hardwood species composition.


1995 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry A. Pearson ◽  
Gale L. Wolters ◽  
Ronald E. Thill ◽  
Alton Martin ◽  
V. Clark Baldwin

New Forests ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia G. Locasio ◽  
B. G. Lockaby ◽  
Jon P. Caulfield ◽  
M. Boyd Edwards ◽  
M. Keith Causey

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Lynch ◽  
Kenneth L. Hitch ◽  
Michael M. Huebschmann ◽  
Paul A. Murphy

Abstract The development of a system of equations that model the growth and development of even-aged natural shortleaf (Pinus echinata Mill.) pine forests is described. The growth prediction system is a distance-independent individual-tree simulator containing equations that predict basal-area growth, survival, total and merchantable heights, and total and merchantable volumes for shortleaf pine trees. These equations were combined into a computer simulation program that predicts future states of shortleaf pine stands from initial stand descriptions. Comparisons of observed and predicted ending stand conditions in shortleaf pine research plots indicate the simulator makes acceptable forecasts of final stand attributes. South. J. Appl. For. 23(4):203-211.


2018 ◽  
Vol 409 ◽  
pp. 84-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Fornwalt ◽  
Charles C. Rhoades ◽  
Robert M. Hubbard ◽  
Rebecca L. Harris ◽  
Akasha M. Faist ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document