The Party-Group Alignment of the NRA and the GOP

Firepower ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 149-185
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Tomas Turner‐Zwinkels ◽  
Oliver Huwyler ◽  
Elena Frech ◽  
Philip Manow ◽  
Stefanie Bailer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyanai Masiya ◽  
Godfrey Maringira

Much of what we know about Zimbabwe's liberation war heroes and heroines is associated with the Zimbabwe African National Union- Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF)'s recognition of individuals who defended its hold on power. However, of late, an upsurge in factionalism in the party has resulted in increasing reference to heroism as a means to exert factional dominance. An understanding of how this has been done can be used to explain ZANU-PF factional dynamics. Current studies call for the study of factionalism to focus on intra-party group dynamics instead of the traditional organisation forms of factions. It is in this context that this study argues that survival or fall of factions within (ZANU-PF) is framed around issues of heroism that is around one's perceived contribution or non-contribution to the liberation struggle. This article demonstrates this growing phenomenon in ZANU-PF veteran leaders whose status has been reshaped by new political moments as factionalism intensified. Inlight of rising factionalism, we argue that, war hero/heroine status in ZANU-PF is not permanent, but is highly shaped by obtaining factional political moments.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Copus
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 18-43
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Lacombe

This chapter lays out a framework for answering why supporters of gun rights are so dedicated to their cause and why the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its members have such an important place in the Republican Party. It discusses how the NRA has crafted a worldview around guns, consisting of both a gun owner social identity and a broader political ideology. The chapter then looks into greater detail about each of these central ideas: the ideational resources of identity and ideology, and the party–group alignment that has been so central to the NRA's more recent political power. The chapter ends by circling back to the previous chapter's discussion of political power, exploring what the NRA can teach us about how power is built and exercised.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Kolodny ◽  
Diana Dwyre

There is a good deal of discussion currently among political scientists about the nature of political parties and the impacts of changing party–group relations. Are so-called outside groups promoting extreme candidates and, thus, contributing to polarization? Or perhaps, party-allied groups follow the party’s lead and support the same candidates the party supports. We view parties as extended party networks (EPNs) and examine the campaign spending practices of formal party organizations (the House congressional campaign committees) and some of the groups that are seen as allied with each party and some we expect to be outside each party’s network. We analyze the levels of congruence and divergence in party and group spending in the 2014 House elections. We find that most nonparty groups support the same candidates favored by the party with which they most identify, and very few are outside each party’s EPN-supporting candidates who are challenging the party’s picks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document