Market Socialism

2021 ◽  
pp. 474-512
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Samuel Freeman

This introductory chapter begins with a discussion of liberalism, which is best understood as an expansive, philosophical notion. Liberalism is a collection of political, social, and economic doctrines and institutions that encompasses classical liberalism, left liberalism, liberal market socialism, and certain central values. This chapter then introduces subsequent chapters, which are divided into three parts. Part I, “Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Economic Justice,” clarifies the distinction between classical liberalism and the high liberal tradition and their relation to capitalism, and then argues that libertarianism is not a liberal view. Part II, “Distributive Justice and the Difference Principle,” analyzes and applies John Rawls’s principles of justice to economic systems and private law. Part III, “Liberal Institutions and Distributive Justice,” focuses on the crucial role of liberal institutions and procedures in determinations of distributive justice and addresses why the first principles of a moral conception of justice should presuppose general facts in their justification.


1989 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Shapiro

The socialist calculation debate is a debate about whether rational economic decisions can be made without markets, or without markets in production goods. Though this debate has been simmering in economics for over 65 years, most philosophers have ignored it. This may be because they are unaware of the debate, or perhaps it is because they have absorbed the conventional view that one side decisively won. This is the side represented by economists such as Oskar Lange and Fred Taylor who, in opposition to free-market economists like Fredrich Hayek, allegedly showed that their version of market socialism is, in principle, as efficient as capitalism.


F. A. Hayek ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 119-139
Author(s):  
Peter J. Boettke
Keyword(s):  

1967 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abram Bergson
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Evangelos Papadimitropoulos

In this article, I examine the content of socialism in the work of Cornelius Castoriadis in its potential relation to the current emergence of collaborative commons. I begin by analysing Castoriadis’ conceptualisation of socialism, as crystallised in the project of individual and collective autonomy, which was initially demonstrated in the journal Socialisme ou Barbarie (1949-1965) and evolved thereafter in his later writings. I continue by briefly presenting some basic points of criticism, after which I explore the potential compatibility of Castoriadis’ political project with the prospect of market socialism, as the latter emerges today in the form of collaborative commons. I argue, in particular, that collaborative commons echo Castoriadis’ conception of socialism in several respects. Finally, I critically develop a series of proposals made by Vasilis Kostakis and Michel Bauwens that could provide fertile ground for further discussion on the prospect of the commons.


Sociologija ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 614-634
Author(s):  
Gorana Djoric

Paper analyses preferred forms of market economy among classes in Serbia, based on the extent to which their members accept different characteristics of market economy. It contributes to the analysis of value orientations of classes in Serbia, though in somewhat different interpretative framework, on different data and with different specification of market economy characteristics. Rejection of liberal market economy is interpreted as possible preference for a different form of market economy, not necessarily as acceptance of redistributive statism, characterizing socialist economy. Analysis is conducted on the level of attitudes, in order to capture the influence of changeable situational factors, in addition to influence of deeper and stable value dispositions. Preferences for particular forms of market economy and their change is analysed on WVS/EVS data, from 1996. to 2008. By the means of factor analysis two dimensions are extracted determining the extent of acceptance of competition and private property, on the one side, and of individual responsibility for ones wellbeing and resulting inequality of income (without state redistribution), on the other. The two dimensions define the space within which classes position themselves regarding their preferences for liberal market economy, social market economy, market socialism and overall rejection of market economy. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 179074: Tradicija, modernizacija i nacionalni identitet u Srbiji i na Balkanu u procesu evropskih integracija]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document