THE ENDURING FEATURES OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM

Author(s):  
Martha Derthick
Keyword(s):  
1989 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pagano ◽  
Ann O'M. Bowman

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1292
Author(s):  
Michael P. Zuckert ◽  
Samuel H. Beer
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-328
Author(s):  
S. G. F. Spackman

Charles Sumner's Supplementary Civil Rights Bill, which after a tortuous legislative history became law as the Civil Rights Act of 1875, was intended to spell out in specific terms the procedural guarantees of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments and so to outlaw racial discrimination in public accommodation, entertainment and transport, in juries, churches and publicly supported schools and charities. The measure was not only the culmination of Sumner's life-long efforts on behalf of the Blacks, but also the only comprehensive attempt made by Congress during Reconstruction to secure racial equality. Yet the purpose of the Act was undermined even before its passage by die racial ambivalence and political calculations of its supporters, while the challenge it made to traditional concepts of American federalism was defeated in 1883 by the Supreme Court's decision that it was unconstitutional. The nature and extent of this challenge, however, becomes apparent only in the context of the pressures that shaped Republican legislation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Michael Bertelli ◽  
Pamela J. Clouser McCann ◽  
Giulia Leila Travaglini

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-326
Author(s):  
Zachary Callen

This article argues that American federalism led both to a greater national role in rail promotion and more centralized railroads in the antebellum period. Local competition among states led Congressional representatives from state unable to build local railroads to turn to federal assistance. Early support for railroads came from representatives in the South and frontier, who were primarily drawn into rail coalitions because of their own inability to build local rail networks. However, over time, competition among states within the coalition as well as concerns about federal power led many initial members of the coalition to drop out. In their place, states that favored a stronger federal state stepped into the coalition and subsequently built a more nationally oriented rail system. This analysis argues that the shifting of policies from local control to national oversight due to local resource shortages is an important aspect of American states building.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document