scholarly journals General Counsel Prominence and Corporate Tax Policy

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Abernathy ◽  
Thomas R. Kubick ◽  
Adi Masli

ABSTRACT Prior research provides evidence that individual executives have a significant effect on firm-level tax policy. Further research has shown that having a corporate general counsel (GC) in a firm's top management team (top five highest-paid executives) significantly affects a firm's accounting and disclosure practices. In this paper, we examine the role of the GC in corporate tax policy. Specifically, we use the ascension of the corporate GC to top management as the identifying event in which the role and influence of the corporate GC becomes more salient. We find strong evidence that GC ascension to top management is associated with an increase in tax aggressiveness, as evidenced by greater book-tax differences and a higher likelihood of engaging in tax shelter activities. Data Availability: Data are obtained from public sources identified in the paper.

Author(s):  
Brian Davis ◽  
Joe McDonagh

The new role of CIO was created in the early 1980s, a time when organizations had just begun to recognize the strategic importance of IS. Prior to that, the most senior role in IS had been that of the IS Manager, a functional or line manager role with only limited involvement with top management. This new role was expected to work within the top management team to “bridge the gap” between the IS department and top management, to ensure the ongoing successful exploitation of IS across the organization. Today, it has been suggested that the role of CIO has now evolved to cover the need to also “bridge the gap” between the organization itself and its external IS technological environment. The purpose of this chapter is to review the IS management literature relating to the CIO in order to gain a greater understanding of the evolution of this role.


2020 ◽  
pp. 147612701989723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairi Maclean ◽  
Charles Harvey ◽  
Benjamin D Golant ◽  
John AA Sillince

Persistent tensions arising from the exploration–exploitation paradox continuously threaten the accomplishment of organizational ambidexterity. Structural, contextual, and sequential solutions designed to alleviate these tensions dominate the ambidexterity literature. None of these adequately explains how top executives implement tension-alleviating managerial initiatives or how they respond in real time to tension-induced organizational perturbations. In this article, through analysis of top management team speeches at Procter & Gamble over a 15-year period, we show how the construction and communication of four innovation narratives—contextualizing, mutualizing, dramatizing, and focalizing—reduced tensions and enhanced organizational ambidexterity. We demonstrate the importance of top management team reflexivity in devising and communicating performative narratives, illustrate the polyphonic model of narrative strategizing, and present a cyclical model suggesting that the accomplishment of organizational ambidexterity is an ongoing dynamic process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1915-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Y. Ou ◽  
Jungmin (Jamie) Seo ◽  
Dongwon Choi ◽  
Peter W. Hom

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 1480-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oli R. Mihalache ◽  
Justin J. J. P. Jansen ◽  
Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch ◽  
Henk W. Volberda

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 957-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carmen Díaz‐Fernández ◽  
M. Rosario González‐Rodríguez ◽  
Biagio Simonetti

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kilduff ◽  
Reinhard Angelmar ◽  
Ajay Mehra

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document