Allograft Liver Biopsy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Coelho Little ◽  
Marina Berenguer

Although not ideal, liver biopsy is the best available method for evaluation of the liver and is considered the gold standard. The most common use of liver biopsies in the posttransplantation setting is for diagnosis of allograft dysfunction presenting with abnormal liver chemistry tests. The causes of allograft dysfunction differ according to time. Early on, preservation and reperfusion injury, infection, donor-related disease, and acute rejection are more common. Later, disease recurrence, de novo disease, and chronic rejection are seen more frequently. A complete history and physical examination are followed by ultrasonography with Doppler. If biliary or vascular causes are suspected, further imaging is performed and stents or surgery planned. If these tests are not diagnostic, a liver biopsy is performed. In addition to diagnosis of allograft dysfunction, protocol liver biopsy can be helpful particularly to diagnose disease recurrence, particularly the immune-mediated diseases, as well as to evaluate the patient for eligibility for immunosuppression minimization and possible withdrawal. Given the risks and cost associated with liver biopsy, several methods are used for evaluation of fibrosis and rejection in the liver allograft. Although very promising, these methods have not been widely validated and are not ready for clinical use.  This review contains 9 figures, 2 tables, and 54 references.  Key Words: biopsy to diagnose allograft liver dysfunction, disease recurrence after liver transplant, immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplant, liver biopsy to guide immunosuppression minimization, noninvasive methods to evaluate liver allograft, posttransplant diagnostic liver biopsy, preservation and reperfusion injury, protocol liver biopsy after transplant

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Coelho Little ◽  
Marina Berenguer

Although not ideal, liver biopsy is the best available method for evaluation of the liver and is considered the gold standard. The most common use of liver biopsies in the posttransplantation setting is for diagnosis of allograft dysfunction presenting with abnormal liver chemistry tests. The causes of allograft dysfunction differ according to time. Early on, preservation and reperfusion injury, infection, donor-related disease, and acute rejection are more common. Later, disease recurrence, de novo disease, and chronic rejection are seen more frequently. A complete history and physical examination are followed by ultrasonography with Doppler. If biliary or vascular causes are suspected, further imaging is performed and stents or surgery planned. If these tests are not diagnostic, a liver biopsy is performed. In addition to diagnosis of allograft dysfunction, protocol liver biopsy can be helpful particularly to diagnose disease recurrence, particularly the immune-mediated diseases, as well as to evaluate the patient for eligibility for immunosuppression minimization and possible withdrawal. Given the risks and cost associated with liver biopsy, several methods are used for evaluation of fibrosis and rejection in the liver allograft. Although very promising, these methods have not been widely validated and are not ready for clinical use.  This review contains 9 figures, 2 tables, and 54 references.  Key Words: biopsy to diagnose allograft liver dysfunction, disease recurrence after liver transplant, immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplant, liver biopsy to guide immunosuppression minimization, noninvasive methods to evaluate liver allograft, posttransplant diagnostic liver biopsy, preservation and reperfusion injury, protocol liver biopsy after transplant


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Schluckebier ◽  
Vladimir L. Cousin ◽  
Laetitia‐Marie Petit ◽  
Dominique Belli ◽  
Barbara Wildhaber ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. A81
Author(s):  
Sonia Berardi ◽  
Francesca Lodato ◽  
Annagiulia Gramenzi ◽  
Antonia D’Errico ◽  
Maria Cristina Morelli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2020-206870
Author(s):  
Neha Bakshi ◽  
Archana Rastogi ◽  
Viniyendra Pamecha ◽  
Chhagan Bihari

AimsSinusoidal dilatation and congestion (SDC) in liver biopsy may be obstructive (due to venous outflow impairment) or non-obstructive in nature. The significance of this finding in the post-liver transplant setting remains unexplored.MethodsWe herein retrospectively analysed all post-transplant liver biopsies showing SDC and examined histopathological features in detail. Association with transaminitis and concurrent graft rejection was assessed.ResultsA total of 30 post-transplant liver biopsies from 27 patients showed SDC with atrophy of hepatocyte cords (SDC; incidence 7.4%). All patients had transaminitis. Most patients (n=22; 81.5%) were asymptomatic with deranged liver function tests (LFTs) detected during routine follow-up, raising clinical suspicion of graft rejection. SDC was non-obstructive in 19 (70.4%) and obstructive (due to sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)) in 8 (29.6%) cases. The incidence of SOS was 2%. SDC was mild, moderate and severe in 18 (66.7%), 7 (25.9%) and 2 (7.4%) cases, respectively. Perivenular and centrilobular sinusoidal fibrosis was seen in the obstructive SDC group (n=3, 11.1%). Concurrent graft rejection was present in 7 (25.9%) cases, of which acute cellular rejection comprised 5 (18.5%), and late acute rejection accounted for 2 cases (7.4%). Serum tacrolimus levels ranged from normal (n=14) to below and above normal (n=5 each). Modulation of immunosuppressive therapy led to normalisation of LFTs in one patient.ConclusionObstructive and non-obstructive SDC in post-liver transplant patients presenting with transaminitis mimics graft rejection clinically and may represent a form of drug-induced liver injury. Liver biopsy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Nakano ◽  
Lillian M. Tran ◽  
David A. Geller ◽  
Camila Macedo ◽  
Diana M. Metes ◽  
...  

Liver allograft recipients are more likely to develop transplantation tolerance than those that receive other types of organ graft. Experimental studies suggest that immune cells and other non-parenchymal cells in the unique liver microenvironment play critical roles in promoting liver tolerogenicity. Of these, liver interstitial dendritic cells (DCs) are heterogeneous, innate immune cells that appear to play pivotal roles in the instigation, integration and regulation of inflammatory responses after liver transplantation. Interstitial liver DCs (recruited in situ or derived from circulating precursors) have been implicated in regulation of both ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and anti-donor immunity. Thus, livers transplanted from mice constitutively lacking DCs into syngeneic, wild-type recipients, display increased tissue injury, indicating a protective role of liver-resident donor DCs against transplant IRI. Also, donor DC depletion before transplant prevents mouse spontaneous liver allograft tolerance across major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barriers. On the other hand, mouse liver graft-infiltrating host DCs that acquire donor MHC antigen via “cross-dressing”, regulate anti-donor T cell reactivity in association with exhaustion of graft-infiltrating T cells and promote allograft tolerance. In an early phase clinical trial, infusion of donor-derived regulatory DCs (DCreg) before living donor liver transplantation can induce alterations in host T cell populations that may be conducive to attenuation of anti-donor immune reactivity. We discuss the role of DCs in regulation of warm and liver transplant IRI and the induction of liver allograft tolerance. We also address design of cell therapies using DCreg to reduce the immunosuppressive drug burden and promote clinical liver allograft tolerance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document