scholarly journals Measurements of Nasal Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide with a Hand-held Device in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: Relation to Cedar Pollen Dispersion and Laser Surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachio Takeno ◽  
Noriaki Noda ◽  
Katsuhiro Hirakawa
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Hee Kim ◽  
Hyun Bin Park ◽  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Hwan Soo Kim ◽  
Hee Seon Lee ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (11) ◽  
pp. 1064-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
V S Nesic ◽  
V Z Djordjevic ◽  
V Tomic-Spiric ◽  
Z R Dudvarski ◽  
I A Soldatovic ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:This study aimed to compare two sampling methods for nasal nitric oxide in healthy individuals and allergic rhinitis patients, and to examine the within-subject reliability of nasal nitric oxide measurement.Methods:The study included 23 allergic rhinitis patients without concomitant asthma and 10 healthy individuals. For all participants, nitric oxide levels were measured non-invasively from the lungs through the mouth (i.e. the oral fractional exhaled nitric oxide) and the nose. Nasal nitric oxide was measured by two different methods: (1) nasal aspiration via one nostril during breath holding and (2) single-breath quiet exhalation against resistance through a tight facemask (i.e. the nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide).Results:Compared with healthy participants, allergic rhinitis patients had significantly higher average oral and nasal nitric oxide levels. All methods of nitric oxide measurement had excellent reliability.Conclusion:Nasal nitric oxide measurement is a useful and reliable clinical tool for diagnosing allergic rhinitis in patients without asthma in an out-patient setting.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1001-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Xu ◽  
Zhijun Zou ◽  
Shuxian Yan ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Haidong Kan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-295
Author(s):  
Ewa Dadas-Stasiak ◽  
◽  
Anna Jung ◽  
Katarzyna Jobs ◽  
Bolesław Kalicki ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 172 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Ciprandi ◽  
Fabio Gallo ◽  
Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo ◽  
Ignazio Cirillo

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hyun Moon ◽  
Hae Ji Jang ◽  
Yoon Sung Park ◽  
Woo Yeon Lee ◽  
Dae Hyun Lim ◽  
...  

Children ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Yoon Young Jang ◽  
Ji Young Ahn

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive test for evaluating the degree of airway inflammation and for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of asthma. We attempted to measure FeNO levels in Korean children with asthma and determine its cutoff value for diagnosing asthma. We enrolled 176 children and adolescents between the ages of 5 and 18 years, who visited for the evaluation of chronic cough, shortness of breath, and wheezing. Among them, 138 patients who underwent skin prick tests or inhalation Immuno CAP (UniCAP; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) tests for allergy testing together with a pulmonary function test were included. FeNO was measured using a NIOX MINO (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden) instrument according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) guidelines. There were 29 patients with asthma, 43 with rhinitis, and 38 with asthma and allergic rhinitis. In the asthma group, FeNO levels significantly correlated with total immunoglobulin E (r = 0.572, p < 0.001), but did not show significant correlation with pulmonary function test parameters (forced vital capacity—FVC, forced expiratory volume in one second—FEV1, FEV1/FVC) or PC20 (provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1). The FeNO cutoff values obtained in the asthma and asthma rhinitis groups were 16.5 ppb and 18.5 ppb, respectively. Hence, we provide a FeNO cutoff value according to the presence or absence of rhinitis in pediatric patients with asthma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document