Modeling chromatic contrast sensitivity across different background colors and luminance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (29) ◽  
pp. 99-104
Author(s):  
Marcel Lucassen ◽  
Dragan Sekulovski ◽  
Marc Lambooij ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Ronnier Luo

In this research we compare chromatic contrast sensitivity models for two separate datasets and for the pooled dataset. They were obtained from two studies employing a very similar experimental paradigm. The data represent threshold visibilities of chromatic Gabor patterns varying in spatial frequency, background chromaticity, direction of color modulation and luminance, at constant stimulus size. Using the extended data set, we reconfirm our previously reported finding that a model based on coloropponent contrast signals is an improvement over a cone contrast model. However, when linear background scaling in classic cone contrast is replaced by nonlinear background scaling, an improvement of almost similar size is obtained. The results of this study can be of interest for the development of vision models employing the processing of spatio-chromatic information.

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-200
Author(s):  
M I Kankaanpää ◽  
J Rovamo ◽  
H T Kukkonen ◽  
J Hallikainen

Contrast sensitivity functions for achromatic and chromatic gratings tend to be band-pass and low-pass in shape, respectively. Our aim was to test whether spatial integration contributes to the shape difference found at low spatial frequencies. We measured binocular chromatic contrast sensitivity as a function of grating area for objectively equiluminous red - green and blue - yellow chromatic gratings. Chromatic contrast refers to the Michelson contrast of either of the two chromatic component gratings presented in counterphase against the combined background. Grating area ( A) varied from 1 to 256 square cycles ( Af2) at spatial frequencies ( f) of 0.125 – 4.0 cycles deg−1. We used only horizontal gratings at low and medium spatial frequencies to minimise the transverse and longitudinal chromatic aberrations due to ocular optics. At all spatial frequencies studied, chromatic contrast sensitivity increased with grating area. Ac was found to be constant at low spatial frequencies (0.125 – 0.5 cycles deg−1) but decreased in inverse proportion to increasing spatial frequency at 1 – 4 cycles deg−1. Thus, spatial integration depends similarly on spatial frequency for achromatic (Luntinen et al, 1995 Vision Research35 2339 – 2346) and chromatic gratings, and differences in spatial integration do not contribute to the shape difference of the respective contrast sensitivity functions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Sophie Wuerger ◽  
Maliha Ashraf ◽  
Minjung Kim ◽  
Jasna Martinovic ◽  
María Pérez-Ortiz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 70b ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Wuerger ◽  
Rafal Mantiuk ◽  
Maria Perez-Ortiz ◽  
Jasna Martinovic

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 0133002 ◽  
Author(s):  
吕玮阁 Lü Weige ◽  
徐海松 Xu Haisong ◽  
汪哲弘 Wang Zhehong ◽  
M. Ronnier Luo M. Ronnier Luo

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1286
Author(s):  
Maliha Ashraf ◽  
Sophie Wuerger ◽  
Minjung Kim ◽  
Helen Saunderson ◽  
Jasna Martinovic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document