scholarly journals After discharge from hospital, where do we go? Follow-up of clients with mental illness and/or addiction: 30 days post-acute care.

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa M. Felker
1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon A Caplan ◽  
Ann Brown

Judging by reports in medical magazines and journals, ?early discharge schemes?, bettertermed ?post acute care?, are not popular with doctors. However, government policyencourages earlier discharge from hospital, so that the choice facing clinicians is todischarge patients early with support, or early without support, or deal with theconsequences of length of stay overruns. Fortunately, government funding for post acutecare is increasing. There is a strong rationale for post acute care based on better patientoutcomes and cost-effectiveness, but these desirable results will only be achieved ifscrupulous attention is paid to detail, as embodied in the 10 principles of post acutecare. To function optimally, post acute care should be coordinated by the hospitalwhich provided the acute care.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Lender ◽  
Janet Prvu Bettger ◽  
Diane Nutter ◽  

Background: Follow-up care with stroke specialists can facilitate patient recovery. To improve care continuity post-stroke the Ohio Coverdell Stroke Program aimed to improve the proportion of hospitalized patients who had a follow-up appointment scheduled with specialty care (neurologist, neurosurgeon or neurology provider) prior to discharge. Methods: Data from Ohio Coverdell Stroke Program hospitals (N=48) were examined to determine the change in performance over a 12-month quality improvement initiative (quarters 1-2=baseline; quarters 3-4=active improvement phase). Admitted stroke patients of any type, planned for discharge home or to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility (post-acute care), and with a follow-up appointment ordered or recommended were included. Patients discharged in quarter 4 with and without an appointment scheduled were compared to identify targeted areas for continued improvement. Results: There were 3,920 stroke patients discharged home and 3,530 discharged to post-acute care. Of patients discharged home during the baseline period, 24.4% had a follow-up appointment scheduled before hospital discharge compared with 44.0% of patients in quarter 4 (80.3% improvement). Of patients discharged to post-acute care during baseline, 25.0% had a follow-up appointment scheduled compared with 40.2% of patients in quarter 4 (60.8% improvement). Improvement in the proportion of patients with a follow-up appointment was significant (p<0.001) for those discharged home and to post-acute care. Analysis of patient characteristics showed fewer appointments were scheduled in quarter 4 for patients discharged home who had a stroke type other than ischemic, were White, obese/overweight, or without a history of hypertension (p<0.05; no difference by age, stroke severity, or other co-morbidities). Among those discharged to post-acute care, fewer appointments were scheduled for patients with a NIHSS<5, White, with Medicare, or no history of coronary artery disease or obesity/overweight (p<0.05). Conclusions: Hospital performance with scheduling specialty care follow-up appointments improved significantly; however, there is room for continued improvement particularly with targeted patient sub-groups identified.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Sarah Warren ◽  
Tim Nanof

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER

Author(s):  
Mar Muñoz-Chápuli Gutiérrez ◽  
Ana Durán-Vila ◽  
Javier Ruiz-Labarta ◽  
Pilar Payá-Martínez ◽  
Pilar Pintado Recarte ◽  
...  

Spain was one of the epicenters of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe in this article the design and results of a new telephone-and-telematic multiplatform model of systematic prenatal and postpartum follow-up for COVID-19-affected women implemented in a tertiary reference hospital in Madrid. We included patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy or delivery from 10 March 2020 to 15 December 2020. We had a total of 211 obstetric patients: 148 (70.1%) were tested at the onset of suspicious clinical manifestations and 62 (29.4%) were tested in the context of routine screening. Of all the patients, 60 women (28.4%) were asymptomatic and 97 (46%) presented mild symptoms. Fifty-one women (24.2%) were admitted to our hospital for specific treatment because of moderate or severe symptoms. We had no missed cases and a good adherence. The mean number of calls per patient was 2.3. We performed 55 in-person visits. We analyzed the complexity of our program over time, showing a two-wave-like pattern. One patient was identified as needing hospitalization and we did not record major morbidity. Telemedicine programs are a strong and reproducible tool to reach to pregnant population affected by COVID-19, to assess its symptoms and severity, and to record for pregnancy-related symptoms both in an outpatient regime and after discharge from hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document