Influence of Critical Cues and Task Constraints on Overarm Throwing Performance in Elementary Age Children

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 753-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Lorson ◽  
Jacqueline D. Goodway
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (27) ◽  
pp. eaau9757 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Cini ◽  
V. Ortenzi ◽  
P. Corke ◽  
M. Controzzi

The human hand is capable of performing countless grasps and gestures that are the basis for social activities. However, which grasps contribute the most to the manipulation skills needed during collaborative tasks, and thus which grasps should be included in a robot companion, is still an open issue. Here, we investigated grasp choice and hand placement on objects during a handover when subsequent tasks are performed by the receiver and when in-hand and bimanual manipulation are not allowed. Our findings suggest that, in this scenario, human passers favor precision grasps during such handovers. Passers also tend to grasp the purposive part of objects and leave “handles” unobstructed to the receivers. Intuitively, this choice allows receivers to comfortably perform subsequent tasks with the objects. In practice, many factors contribute to a choice of grasp, e.g., object and task constraints. However, not all of these factors have had enough emphasis in the implementation of grasping by robots, particularly the constraints introduced by a task, which are critical to the success of a handover. Successful robotic grasping is important if robots are to help humans with tasks. We believe that the results of this work can benefit the wider robotics community, with applications ranging from industrial cooperative manipulation to household collaborative manipulation.


Author(s):  
Colin Ware ◽  
Roland Arsenault

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the use of a spatially aware handheld chart display in a comparison with a track-up fixed display configuration and to investigate how cognitive strategies vary when performing the task of matching chart symbols with environmental features under different display geometries and task constraints. Background: Small-screen devices containing both accelerometers and magnetometers support the development of spatially aware handheld maps. These can be designed so that symbols representing targets in the external world appear in a perspective view determined by the orientation of the device. Method: A panoramic display was used to simulate a marine environment. The task involved matching targets in the scene to symbols on simulated chart displays. In Experiment 1, a spatially aware handheld chart display was compared to a fixed track-up chart display. In Experiment 2, a gaze monitoring system was added and the distance between the chart display and the scene viewpoint was varied. Results: All respondents were faster with the handheld device. Novices were much more accurate with the handheld device. People allocated their gaze very differently if they had to move between a map display and a view of the environment. Conclusion: There may be important benefits to spatially aware handheld displays in reducing errors relating to common navigation tasks. Application: Both the difficulty of spatial transformations and the allocation of attention should be considered in the design of chart displays.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 552-558
Author(s):  
Hubert Makaruk ◽  
Jared Marak Porter ◽  
Marcin Starzak

By analysis of footfall variability in the long jump, triple jump, and pole vault, the present study was designed to highlight gait variability patterns required in varied nested tasks. Twelve male athletes in each event who participated in one international and two national competitions were involved in this study. Twenty five pairs of 1-m Optojump Next system bars were used to evaluate relevant footfall placement. The footfall variability was taken to present the pattern of step regulation and onset of visual regulation. The main results of this study showed that pole vaulters manifested a highly consistent gait pattern, which was different than the pattern which appeared in the horizontal jumps. The results also revealed that the onset of step length adjustments in the horizontal jumps occurred significantly later during the zeroing-in phase of the approach run in comparison to those utilized by the pole vaulters. These findings indicate that locomotor pointing control in the long jump, triple jump, and pole vault produce specific footfall variability patterns due to different task and environmental constraints that need to be taken into account during training and competition settings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Domellöf ◽  
Anna Bäckström ◽  
Anna‐Maria Johansson ◽  
Louise Rönnqvist ◽  
Claes Hofsten ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Keith Davids ◽  
Arne Güllich ◽  
Richard Shuttleworth ◽  
Duarte Araújo

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mohsen Shafizadeh ◽  
Robert Crowther ◽  
Jonathan Wheat ◽  
Keith Davids

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 2102-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Steele ◽  
Matthew C. Tresch ◽  
Eric J. Perreault

Matrix factorization algorithms are commonly used to analyze muscle activity and provide insight into neuromuscular control. These algorithms identify low-dimensional subspaces, commonly referred to as synergies, which can describe variation in muscle activity during a task. Synergies are often interpreted as reflecting underlying neural control; however, it is unclear how these analyses are influenced by biomechanical and task constraints, which can also lead to low-dimensional patterns of muscle activation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether commonly used algorithms and experimental methods can accurately identify synergy-based control strategies. This was accomplished by evaluating synergies from five common matrix factorization algorithms using muscle activations calculated from 1) a biomechanically constrained task using a musculoskeletal model and 2) without task constraints using random synergy activations. Algorithm performance was assessed by calculating the similarity between estimated synergies and those imposed during the simulations; similarities ranged from 0 (random chance) to 1 (perfect similarity). Although some of the algorithms could accurately estimate specified synergies without biomechanical or task constraints (similarity >0.7), with these constraints the similarity of estimated synergies decreased significantly (0.3–0.4). The ability of these algorithms to accurately identify synergies was negatively impacted by correlation of synergy activations, which are increased when substantial biomechanical or task constraints are present. Increased variability in synergy activations, which can be captured using robust experimental paradigms that include natural variability in motor activation patterns, improved identification accuracy but did not completely overcome effects of biomechanical and task constraints. These results demonstrate that a biomechanically constrained task can reduce the accuracy of estimated synergies and highlight the importance of using experimental protocols with physiological variability to improve synergy analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document