Error Reduction by Pigeons on a Spatial Successive Reversal Task under Conditions of Non-Correction

1966 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Gossette ◽  
Harvey Cohen

The performance of 5 pigeons on a successive spatial discrimination reversal task was studied over 29 reversals under conditions of non-correction. A significant reduction of errors occurred following an initial peak error score on the second reversal. Intra-problem error reduction was also significant, with errors remaining only during the initial trials of a session with continued reversal training. Terminal reversal performance approached one-trial reversal.

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Gossette ◽  
Arthur Hombach

There is general agreement that birds and mammals, but not fish, can display error reduction on successive discrimination reversal (SDR) tasks. Reptiles, however, show error reduction on some but not other tasks. To provide further sampling of reptilian SDR performance, two species of crocodilians, the American alligator and the American crocodile, were tested on a spatial discrimination reversal task. Both species displayed error reduction, the alligator being appreciably inferior to the crocodile.


1968 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 675-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Gossette ◽  
Gayle Kraus

To examine the generality of inter-species SDR performance differences previously revealed on a spatial task, four different mammalian species were tested on a brightness successive discrimination reversal task. Analysis showed that the patterns of errors yielded on the spatial task were reproduced on the brightness task, except that on the brightness task, cacomistle performance was inferior to that by squirrel monkeys. Further evidence supporting the differential extinction explanation of inter-species variation in negative transfer was also found.


1968 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 191-192
Author(s):  
Sheila Dietz ◽  
Janet W. Johnson

1974 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith M. Jonson ◽  
Jack G. Lyle ◽  
Marshall J. Edwards ◽  
Richard H.C. Penny

1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill F. Elias

Spatial discrimination reversal learning was explored for mice genetically selected for high brain weight and unselected controls with lower brain weights. Control-line Ss escaped from a water maze more rapidly, but high-line Ss made fewer errors and took less trials to reach criterion on the first reversal. Control-line Ss were unable to complete more than 1 reversal, while high-line Ss all completed at least 7 reversals. This positive relation between reversal learning and brain size is consistent with comparisons among species and experiments manipulating brain size by means of drugs or surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document