scholarly journals Long-term Skeletal Stability of Computer-Assisted Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate-Related Midfacial Hypoplasia

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kanno ◽  
Shintaro Sukegawa ◽  
Akane Shibata ◽  
Yoshihiko Furuki ◽  
Hitoshi Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Midfacial Hypoplasia ◽  
Skeletal Stability ◽  
Maxillary Distraction

scholarly journals Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1115-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humam Saltaji ◽  
Michael P. Major ◽  
Mostafa Altalibi ◽  
Mohamed Youssef ◽  
Carlos Flores-Mir
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Maxillary Advancement ◽  
Skeletal Stability

Long-term Follow-up after Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Shing Huang ◽  
Pandurangan Harikrishnan ◽  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Ellen W. C. Ko ◽  
Eric J. W. Liou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Anterior Nasal Spine ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The University ◽  
Maxillary Distraction

Objective: To evaluate the changes in maxillary position after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in six growing children with cleft lip and palate. Design: Retrospective, longitudinal study on maxillary changes at A point, anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, central incisor, and first molar. Setting: The University Hospital Craniofacial Center. Main Outcome Measure: Cephalometric radiographs were used to measure the maxillary position immediately after distraction, at 6 months, and more than 1 year after distraction. Results: After maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction device, the maxilla (A point) on average moved forward 9.7 mm and downward 3.5 mm immediately after distraction, moved backward 0.9 mm and upward 2.0 mm after 6 months postoperatively, and then moved further backward 2.3 mm and downward 6.8 mm after more than 1 year from the predistraction position. Conclusion: In most cases, maxilla moved forward at distraction and started to move backward until 1 year after distraction, but remained forward, as compared with predistraction position. Maxilla also moved downward during distraction and upward in 6 months, but started descending in 1 year. There also was no further forward growth of the maxilla after distraction in growing children with clefts.

scholarly journals A Case of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate with Postoperative Skeletal Stability after Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-233
Author(s):  
AU SASAKI ◽  
ERI TANAKA ◽  
DOROTTYA FRANK ◽  
REI SHINAGAWA ◽  
YUHO KATO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Skeletal Stability ◽  
Maxillary Distraction

scholarly journals Long-Term Effect of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) on Nasal Index in Adult Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar Jena ◽  
Vidya Rattan ◽  
Satinder Pal Singh ◽  
Ashok Kumar Utreja ◽  
Singh Sombir
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Term Effect ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Long Term Effect ◽  
Maxillary Distraction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document