scholarly journals Resistance to Extinction After Gradually Increased or Decreased Ratio of Partial Reward Schedule

1982 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
MASATO ISHIDA
1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 1007-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean L. Fixsen ◽  
Susan Swick Mc Bee ◽  
Patrick E. Campbell ◽  
Charles M. Crumbaugh

2 experiments investigating the effects of intertrial reward on resistance to extinction following partial reward schedules containing N-lengths (number of consecutive nonrewards preceding a rewarded trial) of 1, 2, or 3. It was found that intertrial rewards completely eliminated the partial reinforcement effect for all N-lengths when run times were considered but had no effect on goal times. These data were discussed in terms of their relevance to the modified aftereffects hypothesis and previous investigations of intertrial reward.


1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-500
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Campbell ◽  
George M. Batsch ◽  
Kim McNabb ◽  
Stephen B. Knouse

30 rats were trained in a runway for 16 days at 5 trials a day. During acquisition (10 days) Ss were trained on an irregular 50% partially delayed reward schedule. The duration of delay was 30 sec. and 2 pellets of reward were given on all delayed trials. The magnitude of immediate reward was varied over three levels (2, 10, 24 pellets) as a between-groups factor. Although the larger rewards developed somewhat faster acquisition speeds than the small reward the results did not reach statistical reliability. During extinction, however, the larger magnitudes of reward significantly increased resistance to extinction. These results were discussed in terms of aftereffects, frustration, and dissonance theories of extinction.


1972 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-491
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Campbell ◽  
J. Stephen Prestwood ◽  
Shari H. Walters ◽  
George M. Batsche

16 albino rats were trained in a runway on an alternating partial reward schedule and in another runway on an irregular partial reward schedule. The rats learned to pattern their responses in the alternating setting, running faster on rewarded trials than on nonrewarded trials, but such patterning did not occur in the irregular setting. Extinction proved to be faster in the alternating setting than in the irregular setting replicating previous between-subject experiments.


1972 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-160
Author(s):  
J. M. Bloom ◽  
Leroy P. Metze ◽  
Robert A. McFarlainf

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-334
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Campbell ◽  
Charles M. Crumbaugh ◽  
Carol Massey ◽  
Elaine Reed

Two groups of rats ( N = 10) were trained in a runway on a single alternation partial reward schedule. One group received electric shock contingent on running on all nonrewarded trials. The remaining animals received identical shocks but during selected intertrial intervals and not contingent on the running response. Both groups learned a pattern discrimination but the contingent-shock animals learned earlier and performed better than the non-contingent-shock subjects. These data suggest that punishment can profitably be considered from the point of view of aftereffects theory.


1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 631-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vogel-Sprott ◽  
E. Thurston

An instrumental response was trained in humans under 50% partial reward or 100% continuous reward. Partial reinforcement groups subsequently displayed superior resistance to continuous punishment which was coupled with either 100%, 50% or 0% reward. Although resistance to punishment generally increased when it was coupled with more frequent reward, the partial reinforcement groups receiving punishment coupled with either 100% or 50% reward did not differ. Resistance to extinction after punishment treatments was higher for groups trained under partial reward. The results were consistent with the notion of transfer effects between punishment and frustrative nonreward stimuli. In addition, both the punishment and the subsequent extinction of an unwanted response in humans appeared to be importantly determined by the initial acquisition history of the response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document