scholarly journals Effects of the Preexposure of a Taste or an Odor upon the Compound Taste-Odor Aversion Conditioning in Rats

1990 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-62
Author(s):  
KAZUYUKI YAMADA
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Cochran ◽  
Christina Trost ◽  
Aaron Blankenship ◽  
W. Robert Batsell

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (supplement) ◽  
pp. S64
Author(s):  
T. Inoue ◽  
S. Watanabe ◽  
S. Kawahara ◽  
Y. Kirino

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 3898-3903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Inoue ◽  
Masayoshi Murakami ◽  
Satoshi Watanabe ◽  
Yasuko Inokuma ◽  
Yutaka Kirino

We developed an in vitro odor-aversion conditioning system in the terrestrial mollusk, Limax, and found a behavioral correlate of network oscillation in the olfactory CNS. We first examined the odor-induced behavior of Limax, after odor-aversion conditioning in vivo. Shortening of mantle muscles was specifically observed in response to aversively conditioned odors. We previously identified that parietal nerves, which project to the mantle muscle in Limax, regulate shortening of the mantle muscle. We therefore isolated whole brains containing noses (sensory organs) and parietal nerves (motor output), and applied an odor-aversion conditioning paradigm to these in vitro preparations. Before the in vitro conditioning, application of attractive odors to the noses did not elicit any discharge in the parietal nerves. However, after odor-aversion conditioning, discharges in the parietal nerves were observed in response to the natively attractive but aversively conditioned odors. We also found that network oscillation frequency in the procerebrum (PC), the olfactory CNS of Limax, increased specifically in response to the aversively conditioned odors that elicited avoidance behavior. In naive (nonconditioned) preparations, increases in the PC oscillation frequency were observed specifically in response to innately aversive odors. These results indicate that the isolated brains have an ability of odor learning. They also suggest that changes in PC network oscillation are associated with aversively conditioned and innately aversive odors, both of which elicit avoidance behavior. This in vitro conditioning system would be an effective approach for exploring the neural mechanism to determine the aversion to odors.


1982 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Stickrod ◽  
Daniel P. Kimble ◽  
William P. Smotherman

1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Cole ◽  
Nigel W. Bond

The present study evaluated the efficacy of olfactory aversion conditioning in the management of overeating problems. 42 overweight female subjects were assigned to one of three treatment conditions: olfactory aversion therapy, attention placebo control, and no-contact control. One experimenter administered the 8-wk. treatment phase. The aversion therapy procedure entailed the pairing of selected target foods (CSs) with noxious odors (UCSs). There were 25 pairings of the CS and UCSs during each weekly session. Four noxious odors were employed, one each week, to prevent habituation to the UCS. The attention-placebo control procedure was identical except that “air” was substituted for the putative UCS of the aversion therapy condition. At the end of the treatment period the aversion therapy group had lost 4.7 lb.; the attention placebo controls had lost 3.6 lb. and the no-contact controls 0.5 lb. The difference between the aversion therapy group and the no-contact controls was significant and that between the attention placebo group and the no-contact controls approached significance. At a follow-up 8 wk. after the end of the treatment period the weights of all groups had risen to pretreatment levels and there were no differences between them. These results indicate that olfactory aversion therapy is not an efficient technique in promoting weight-loss.


1986 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Alleva ◽  
Gemma Calamandrei

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document