CREATE Kestrel CFD Predictions of LPD 17 Airwake with Comparisons to Wind Tunnel Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Czerwiec ◽  
Bradford Green ◽  
Susan Polsky
Keyword(s):  
1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. WINCHENBACH ◽  
R. CHELEKIS ◽  
B. USELTON ◽  
W. HATHAWAY

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Campbell ◽  
Jose Caram ◽  
Scott Berry ◽  
Michael DiFulvio ◽  
Tom Horvath ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (39) ◽  
pp. 6238-6253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Aristodemou ◽  
Tom Bentham ◽  
Christopher Pain ◽  
Roy Colvile ◽  
Alan Robins ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Le Good ◽  
J. P. Howell ◽  
M. A. Passmore ◽  
K. P. Garry

1967 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
DENNIS M. JECMEN ◽  
J. PETER REDING ◽  
LARS E. ERICSSON

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Maeda ◽  
E. Ismaili ◽  
H. Kawabuchi ◽  
Y. Kamada

This paper exploits blade surface pressure data acquired by testing a three-bladed upwind turbine operating in the field. Data were collected for a rotor blade at spanwise 0.7R with the rotor disc at zero yaw. Then, for the same blade, surface pressure data were acquired by testing in a wind tunnel. Analyses compared aerodynamic forces and surface pressure distributions under field conditions against analogous baseline data acquired from the wind tunnel data. The results show that aerodynamic performance of the section 70%, for local angle of attack below static stall, is similar for free stream and wind tunnel conditions and resemblances those commonly observed on two-dimensional aerofoils near stall. For post-stall flow, it is presumed that the exhibited differences are attributes of the differences on the Reynolds numbers at which the experiments were conducted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document