An Undergraduate Student Instrumentation Project to Develop Instruments Study the Auroral Ionosphere and Stratospheric Ozone Layer Using Lightweight Balloon Payloads

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar A. Bering ◽  
Elizabeth Hernandez ◽  
Alexandra Ulinski ◽  
Ana G. Pessoa ◽  
Presley Greer
Author(s):  
Boyan Tatarov ◽  
Chan Bong Park ◽  
Hideaki Nakane ◽  
Nobuo Sugimoto ◽  
Ichiro Matsui ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 211 (4487) ◽  
pp. 1158-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. PARRISH ◽  
R. L. DE ZAFRA ◽  
P. M. SOLOMON ◽  
J. W. BARRETT ◽  
E. R. CARLSON

1978 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 807-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Uchino ◽  
Mitsuo Maeda ◽  
Jun‐ichi Kohno ◽  
Takashi Shibata ◽  
Chikao Nagasawa ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Zuev ◽  
A. V. El'nikov ◽  
Valerii N. Marichev ◽  
V. L. Pravdin

2019 ◽  
pp. 304-322
Author(s):  
Frederike Albrecht ◽  
Charles F. Parker

The Montreal Protocol—the regime designed to protect the stratospheric ozone layer—has widely been hailed as the gold standard of global environmental governance and is one of few examples of international institutional cooperative arrangements successfully solving complex transnational problems. Although the stratospheric ozone layer still bears the impacts of ozone depleting substances (ODSs), the problem of ozone depletion is well on its way to being solved due to the protocol. This chapter examines how the protocol was designed and implemented in a way that has allowed it to successfully overcome a number of thorny challenges that most international environmental regimes must face: how to attract sufficient participation, how to promote compliance and manage non-compliance, how to strengthen commitments over time, how to neutralize or co-opt potential ‘veto players’, how to make the costs of implementation affordable, how to leverage public opinion in support of the regime’s goals, and, ultimately, how to promote the behavioural and policy changes needed to solve the problems and achieve the goals the regime was designed to solve. The chapter concludes that while some of the reasons for the Montreal Protocol’s success, such as fairly affordable, available substitutes for ODSs, are not easy to replicate, there are many other elements of this story that can be utilized when thinking about how to design solutions to other transnational environmental problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document