Lunar PAD Post-Hot Fire Test Performance Evaluation

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres I. Campbell ◽  
Helen C. Carson ◽  
Miriam De Soto ◽  
Michael Fiske ◽  
Luke Martin ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Francisco Gonzalez ◽  
Anand Prabhakaran ◽  
Andrew Robitaille ◽  
A. M. Birk ◽  
Frank Otremba

The frequent incidences of Non-Accident Releases (NARs) of lading from tank cars have resulted in an increasing interest in transporting hazardous materials in total containment conditions (i.e., no pressure relief devices). However, the ability of tank cars to meet thermal protection requirements provided in the Code of Federal Regulations under conditions of total containment has not been established. The intent of this effort was to evaluate through a series of third-scale fire tests, the ability of tank cars to meet the thermal protection requirements under total containment conditions, with a particular focus on caustic ladings. A previous paper on this effort described the test design and planning effort associated with this research effort. A series of seven fire tests were conducted using third scale tanks. The test fires simulated fully engulfing, hydrocarbon fueled, pool fire conditions. The initial tests were conducted with water as a lading under jacketed and non-jacketed conditions and also with different fill levels (98% full or 50% full). Additionally, two tests were conducted with the caustic, Sodium Hydroxide as the lading, each test with a different fill level. In general, the tanks with water were allowed to fail or reach near-failure conditions, whereas, the tests with the caustic lading were not allowed to proceed near failure for safety reasons. This paper describes the results and observations from the fire tests, and discusses the various factors that affected the fire test performance of the test tanks. Review of results from the one-third scale tests, and subsequent scaling to full-scale suggest that a full-scale tank car filled with 50% NaOH solution is unlikely to meet the 100-minute survival requirement under conditions of total containment.


Author(s):  
N. Van der Moeren ◽  
V.F. Zwart ◽  
E.B. Lodder ◽  
W. Van den Bijllaardt ◽  
H.R.J.M. Van Esch ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesThis study was primarily conducted to evaluate clinical sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test ‘BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2’ (VRD) compared to real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, the VRD sensitivity for different Ct-value groups (Ct <20; Ct 20-25, Ct 25-30 and Ct ≥30) and different intervals since symptom onset (< 7 days; ≥ 7 days) were examined.DesignProspective performance evaluation study.SettingMunicipal Health Service (GGD) COVID-19 test centres in West-Brabant, the NetherlandsParticipantsIn order to evaluate clinical specificity, 352 symptomatic adults (≥18 years) who presented at a participating GGD test centre for a COVID-19 test between September 28 and October 7 2020 were included. In order to evaluate clinical sensitivity, 123 symptomatic adults (≥18 years) who were tested positive with qRT-PCR in a participating GGD test centre between September 26 and October 6 were included.ResultsAn overall clinical specificity of 100% (95%CI: 98.9%-100%) and sensitivity of 80.7% (95% CI: 73,2%-86,9%) was found for the VRD compared to qRT-PCR. Sensitivity was the highest for low Ct-value categories and for specimen obtained within the first days after disease onset. For specimen obtained within 7 days after onset of symptoms, the overall sensitivity was 91.0% (95% CI: 82,4%-96,3%) and 98,6% (95% CI: 92,3%-100%) for samples with qRT-PCR Ct-value beneath 30.ConclusionThe VRD is a promising diagnostic test for COVID-19 community screening for symptomatic individuals within 7 days after symptom onset in function of disease control. The clinical sensitivity was highest when viral load was high, which correlated with the duration of symptoms. Further research on practical applicability and the optimal position of the test within the current testing landscape is needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 937-953
Author(s):  
Maxime Alex Junior Kuitche ◽  
Ruxandra Mihaela Botez ◽  
Remi Viso ◽  
Jean Christophe Maunand ◽  
Oscar Carranza Moyao

Author(s):  
Kenneth M. Butler ◽  
M. Ray Mercer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document