ORTHOPAEDIC TREATMENT WITH PRESURGICAL NASOALVEOLAR MOULDING IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE

Author(s):  
Victoria Nunez Vera
1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Shaw

Serial frontal and lateral cephalometric radiographs with implants and study models of 31 infants' who received orthopaedic treatment for unilateral cleft lip and palate, were analysed with an electronic XY reader. Partial data for 50 normal infants and 10 isolated palatal cleft patients were included to allow certain comparisons. The records at birth indicate that the size of the alveolar cleft in unilateral cleft cases is governed mainly by the degree of transverse segmental separation which is present and only to a lesser extent by deficiency of alveolar tissue, except in a minority of cases. It is clear that in the early months of life, the divided maxillary arch can be made to assume near normal dimensions by inward rotation of the anterior ends of the segments, at the alveolar and basal level, around axes in the tuberosity regions. Appositional growth of the cleft margins makes little contribution to the reduction in cleft size. The significance of the findings is discussed.


1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Shaw

A simulated trial was carried out to assess the accuracy of cephalometric radiography with the aid of implants in infants receiving cleft lip and palate orthopaedic treatment. The stability of the implants is also discussed. It was concluded that the technique is of limited value since the implants may be disturbed by the developing teeth and because slight inaccuracy in head positioning may lead to substantial errors of interpretation.


1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Huddart ◽  
J. J. Crabb

The investigation measures the area of palatal tissue at birth and at four months in three groups of subjects: (1) 30 complete unilateral cleft lip and palate cases who received presurgical maxillary orthopaedic treatment; (2) 15 similar cases who did not receive such treatment and were used as controls; (3) 30 normal children with intact palates. The changes occurring in the three groups of cases over the four month period are compared. In particular it was noted that presurgical treatment retarded the growth of palatal tissue. The significance of this in relation to the other findings and presurgical treatment generally is discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-892
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Napoli ◽  
Linda D. Vallino

Purpose The 2 most commonly used operations to treat velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) are superiorly based pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, both of which may result in hyponasal speech and airway obstruction. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the bilateral buccal flap revision palatoplasty (BBFRP) as an alternative technique to manage VPI while minimizing these risks and (b) conduct a systematic review of the evidence of BBFRP on speech and other clinical outcomes. A report comparing the speech of a child with hypernasality before and after BBFRP is presented. Method A review of databases was conducted for studies of buccal flaps to treat VPI. Using the principles of a systematic review, the articles were read, and data were abstracted for study characteristics that were developed a priori. With respect to the case report, speech and instrumental data from a child with repaired cleft lip and palate and hypernasal speech were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Eight articles were included in the analysis. The results were positive, and the evidence is in favor of BBFRP in improving velopharyngeal function, while minimizing the risk of hyponasal speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Before surgery, the child's speech was characterized by moderate hypernasality, and after surgery, it was judged to be within normal limits. Conclusion Based on clinical experience and results from the systematic review, there is sufficient evidence that the buccal flap is effective in improving resonance and minimizing obstructive sleep apnea. We recommend BBFRP as another approach in selected patients to manage VPI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9919352


1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro A. Figueroa ◽  
John W. Polley ◽  
Mimis Cohen

BDJ ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 185 (7) ◽  
pp. 320-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biase Di ◽  
A Markus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document