Long-term follow-up of total lumbar disc replacement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joep Kitzen
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 1417-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph J. Siepe ◽  
Franziska Heider ◽  
Karsten Wiechert ◽  
Wolfgang Hitzl ◽  
Basem Ishak ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0034-1376566-s-0034-1376566
Author(s):  
C. J. Siepe ◽  
F. Heider ◽  
K. Wiechert ◽  
C. Mehren ◽  
A. Korge ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1527-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kitzen ◽  
M. G. M. Schotanus ◽  
S. M. J. van Kuijk ◽  
E. M. C. Jutten ◽  
N. P. Kort ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
pp. 056-061
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Kuzmich Chertkov

Development history and construction features of the first Russian functional lumbar disc endoprosthesis, its application technique, as well as indications and contraindications for surgical disc replacement are presented. The early and long-term results of Russian devices application are compared with those of foreign analogs. The result evaluation was performed by objective methods of study: clinical biomechanics, neurophysiology, and functional spine radiology. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 10 years.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-33
Author(s):  
I. A. Stepanov ◽  
V. A. Beloborodov ◽  
Z. S. Saakyan ◽  
I. I. Tomashov ◽  
V. G. Trepeznikov

The study objective is to analyze long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in patients after performing total lumbar disc replacement at the level of the lumbosacral junction.Materials and methods. A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was performed. The study included medical records of patients who underwent total lumbar disc replacement at the level of the lumbosacral junction. Both clinical and instrumental parameters were assessed. According to the eligibility criteria, 93 patients were included in the study (38 men, 55 women, mean age 39.9 ± 7.5 years). The average postoperative observation period for the respondents was 33.4 ± 9.5 months.Results. The severity of pain in the lumbar spine on a visual analogue scale significantly decreased (from 7.3 ± 2.5 to 1.9 ± 2.2 cm, p <0.001). The indicators of the quality of life according to the Oswestry Disability Index and according to the Short Form-36 scale (including the mental and physical components) of the studied group of respondents significantly improved (from 43.4 ± 17.6 to 18.9 ± 16.0 %, р <0.001 and from 30.8 ± 8.5 to 52.3 ± 12.4 %, p <0.001, respectively). From the 12th month of observation of the respondents, a significant decrease in the values of the range of motions of the operated segment was noted from 5.3 ± 3.2° to 4.1 ± 3.6° (p <0.009). Also, from the 12th month of postoperative observation, a slight decrease in the values of the range of motions of the adjacent segment from 8.6 ± 4.1° to 7.8 ± 3.8° (p >0.05) was verified. The value of global lumbar lordosis after the installation of a lumbar intervertebral disc prosthesis at the level of the lumbosacral junction significantly increased from 49.1 ± 4.8° to 55.6 ± 5.5° (p <0.001). Intervertebral disc prostheses with a lordotic angle of 10° reliably positively correlate with an increase in the values of segmental lordosis, in contrast to implants with an angle of 6° (rS = 0.86, p = 0.04). The severity of pain in the lumbar spine according to visual analogue scale and the range of motion of the operated segment has a significant negative correlation in the late periods of postoperative follow-up (24 and 36 months, rS = -0.74, p = 0.015).Conclusion. The total lumbar disc replacement technique is an effective method of surgical treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the intervertebral discs of the lumbosacral spine, including at the level of the lumbosacral junction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. S211
Author(s):  
Luis Marchi ◽  
Luiz Pimenta ◽  
Leonardo Oliveira ◽  
Joes Nogueira-Neto ◽  
Etevaldo Coutinho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dean C. Perfetti ◽  
Jesse M. Galina ◽  
Peter B. Derman ◽  
Richard D. Guyer ◽  
Donna D. Ohnmeiss ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 155 (12) ◽  
pp. 2333-2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gempt ◽  
M. Jonek ◽  
F. Ringel ◽  
A. Preuß ◽  
P. Wolf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document