A Single Period Stochastic Model for Maximising Firms Value

GIS Business ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 39-45
Author(s):  
J. P. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Value Maximization ◽  
Risk Return ◽  
Bankruptcy Costs ◽  
Single Period ◽  
Debt Capacity

This article sets up a single period value maximization model for the firm based on stochastic end-of-period cash inflows, stochastic bankruptcy costs and taxes based on income rather than wealth. The risk-return trade-off is captured in the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Thus, the model also assumes a perfect capital market and market equilibrium. The model establishes the existence of a unique optimal financial leverage at which the firm value is maximized, this leverage being less than the maximum debt capacity of the firm.

A Single Period Stochastic Model for Maximising Firms Value

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Value Maximization ◽  
Risk Return ◽  
Bankruptcy Costs ◽  
Single Period ◽  
Debt Capacity

This article sets up a single period value maximization model for the firm based on stochastic end-of-period cash inflows, stochastic bankruptcy costs and taxes based on income rather than wealth. The risk-return trade-off is captured in the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Thus, the model also assumes a perfect capital market and market equilibrium. The model establishes the existence of a unique optimal financial leverage at which the firm value is maximized, this leverage being less than the maximum debt capacity of the firm.

Application of CAPM in the Indian Stock Market A Comprehensive Reassessment

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj S. Dhankar ◽  
Rohini Singh
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Conflicting Evidence ◽  
Empirical Tests ◽  
Indian Stock Market

There is conflicting evidence on the applicability of Capital Asset Pricing Model in the Indian stock market. Data for 158 stocks listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange was analyzed using a number of tests from 1991–2002, the period which roughly coincides with the period after liberalization and initiation of capital market reforms. Taken in aggregate the various empirical tests show that CAPM is not valid for the Indian stock market for the period studied.

scholarly journals PENGUKURAN KINERJA PORTOFOLIO OPTIMAL CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) DAN ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY (APT) (Studi Kasus : Saham-saham LQ45)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedi Baleo Pasaribu ◽  
Di Asih I Maruddani ◽  
Sugito Sugito
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Arbitrage Pricing Theory ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Arbitrage Pricing ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Pricing Theory

Investing is placing money or funds in the hope of obtaining additional or specific gains on the money or funds. The capital market is one place to invest in the financial field of interest to investor. This is because the capital market gives investor the freedom to choose securities traded in the capital market in accordance with the wishes of investor. Investor are included in risk averter, that means investor will always try to avoid risk. To avoid risk, investor try to diversify their investment. Diversification concept commonly used is portfolio. To maximize the return to be earned, the investor will invest his funds into several stocks in order to earn a greater profit. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is a balance model that describes the relation of a risk with return more simply because it uses only one variable to describe the risk. Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is a balance model that used many risk variables to see the relation of risk and return. With both models will be obtained a portfolio with each constituent stock is four stocks selected from 45 stocks in the LQ45 index. To find out which portfolio is the best performed a performance analysis using the Sharpe index. From the measurement result, it is found that the best portfolio is the CAPM portfolio with composite stock is PTBA with investment weight of 0.467%, BUMI with investment weight of 12.855%, ANTM with investment weight of 53.077% and PPRO with investment weight of 33.601%. Keywords: LQ45, portfolio, Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Arbitrage Pricing Theory                       (APT), Sharpe Index 

scholarly journals Verifying Capital Asset Pricing Model in Greek Capital Market

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansoor Maitah ◽  
Khurshid Khudoykulov ◽  
Kholnazar Amonov ◽  
Umar Burkhanov
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model

scholarly journals Validity of CAPM by Using Portfolios: Evidence from Indian Capital Market

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
K.M. Yaseer ◽  
K.P. Shaji
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Expected Returns ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Daily Data ◽  
Capm Model

This article tests the validity of Capital Asset pricing Model and compares the results of 16 periods including 14 sub periods which comprises 3 years each for the prediction of the expected returns in the Indian capital Market. The tests were conducted on portfolios having different security combinations. By using Black Jenson and Scholes methodology (1972) the study tested the validity of the model for the whole and different sub periods. The study used daily data of the BSE 100 index for the period from January 2001 to December 2010. Empirical results mostly in favor of the standard CAPM model. However, the result does not find conclusive evidence in support of CAPM  

scholarly journals Financial Risk and Better Returns through Smart Beta Exchange-Traded Funds?

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Jordan Bowes ◽  
Marcel Ausloos
Keyword(s):  
Financial Risk ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Exchange Traded Funds ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Risk Return ◽  
Relative Return ◽  
Smart Beta ◽  
Do So

Smart beta exchange-traded funds (SB ETFs) have caught the attention of investors due to their supposed ability to offer a better risk–return trade-off than traditionally structured passive indices. Yet, research covering the performance of SB ETFs benchmarked to traditional cap-weighted market indices remains relatively scarce. There is a lack of empirical evidence enforcing this phenomenon. Extending the work of Glushkov (“How Smart are “Smart Beta” ETFs? …”, 2016), we provide a quantitative analysis of the performance of 145 EU-domicile SB ETFs over a 12 year period, from 30 December 2005 to 31 December 2017, belonging to 9 sub-categories. We outline which criteria were retained such that the investigated ETFs had at least 12 consecutive monthly returns data. We consider three models: the Sharpe–Lintner capital asset pricing model, the Fama–French three-factor model, and the Carhart four-factor model, discussed in the literature review sections, in order to assess the factor exposure of each fund to market, size, value, and momentum factors, according to the pertinent model. In order to do so, the sample of SB ETFs and benchmarks underwent a series of numerical assessments in order to aim at explaining both performance and risk. The measures chosen are the Annualised Total Return, the Annualised Volatility, the Annualised Sharpe Ratio, and the Annualised Relative Return (ARR). Of the sub-categories that achieved greater ARRs, only two SB categories, equal and momentum, are able to certify better risk-adjusted returns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document