scholarly journals Comparing Moral Reasoning across Graduate Occupational and Physical Therapy Students and Practitioners

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda S Howard ◽  
Cheyenne Kern ◽  
Olivia Milliner ◽  
Lindsey Newhart ◽  
Sarah K Burke
2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (4_Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7411500076p1
Author(s):  
Brenda Howard ◽  
Cheyenne Kern ◽  
Olivia Milliner ◽  
Lindsey Newhart ◽  
Sarah Burke

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Liu ◽  
Phyllis Schneider ◽  
Masako Miyazaki

Seventy-three occupational and physical therapy students participated in two seminars. In one seminar, students interacted directly with a simulated patient; in the other, students viewed a videotape of a simulated patient interacting with a clinician. Each student submitted the following for each seminar: a list of problems and treatment plans, a rating form indicating satisfaction with group participation, and a rating form indicating satisfaction with topics covered. Within-group comparisons showed that identification of patient problems by the students tended to agree with expert clinicians in the simulated patient condition when compared with the videotape condition although this difference failed to reach significance ( P=0.056). More of the student treatment plans agreed with expert clinicians in the videotape condition when compared with the simulated patient condition ( P<0.01). Both group process and content ratings in the simulated patient condition exceeded those in the videotape condition.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin M. Thomas ◽  
Melinda F. Rybski ◽  
Tonya L. Apke ◽  
Deb A. Kegelmeyer ◽  
Anne D. Kloos

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaina DaLomba ◽  
Saji Mansur ◽  
Tore Bonsaksen ◽  
Mary Jan Greer

Abstract Background Occupational and physical therapy academic programs are rigorous. Increased rates of student anxiety and depression may impact learning. Data on student study skills, self-efficacy, and mental health is limited. This study explored relationships between students’ self-efficacy, mental health factors, and approaches to studying. Method A cross-sectional study was designed. Seventy-three students completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students-Short Form, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Mental Health Continuum-Short Form. Associations between predictors (education program, general self-efficacy and mental health) and ratings on the study approach scales were analyzed with multiple linear regression. Results Multiple regression models revealed associations between higher self-efficacy and higher ratings on the deep (β = 0.49, p <  0.01) and strategic (β = 0.34, p <  0.05) scales, and lower ratings on the surface scale (β = − 0.29, p <  0.01). Compared to OT students, PT students had higher surface approach ratings (β = − 0.36, p <  0.001). Poorer mental health scores were associated with higher surface approach ratings (β = − 0.41, p < 0.001). Conclusions To support productive study strategies among occupational and physical therapy students it may be useful to promote their general self-efficacy and positive mental health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document