scholarly journals Diagnosis: A critical social reflection in the genomic era

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Jutel

© 2019, Associacao Brasileira de Pos - Graduacao em Saude Coletiva. All rights reserved. Diagnosis is a pivotal tool for the work of medicine as they categorise and classify individual ailments via a generalised schema. However diagnosis is also a profoundly social act, which reflects society, its values and how it makes sense of illness and disease. Considering diagnosis critically, as well as practically, is an important job of the sociologist. This paper reviews how a social model can provide a critical tool for viewing diagnosis in the genomic era. It explores how the formulation of diagnosis, be it via genetic explanations or microbiological ones, are the product of social discovery, negotiation, and consensus.

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 3619-3626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Jutel

Abstract Diagnosis is a pivotal tool for the work of medicine as they categorise and classify individual ailments via a generalised schema. However diagnosis is also a profoundly social act, which reflects society, its values and how it makes sense of illness and disease. Considering diagnosis critically, as well as practically, is an important job of the sociologist. This paper reviews how a social model can provide a critical tool for viewing diagnosis in the genomic era. It explores how the formulation of diagnosis, be it via genetic explanations or microbiological ones, are the product of social discovery, negotiation, and consensus.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Jutel

© 2019, Associacao Brasileira de Pos - Graduacao em Saude Coletiva. All rights reserved. Diagnosis is a pivotal tool for the work of medicine as they categorise and classify individual ailments via a generalised schema. However diagnosis is also a profoundly social act, which reflects society, its values and how it makes sense of illness and disease. Considering diagnosis critically, as well as practically, is an important job of the sociologist. This paper reviews how a social model can provide a critical tool for viewing diagnosis in the genomic era. It explores how the formulation of diagnosis, be it via genetic explanations or microbiological ones, are the product of social discovery, negotiation, and consensus.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison K. Kruse ◽  
Sushil K. Oswal

Employing some of the features of participatory research methodology, a disabled faculty joins a student with mental health diagnosis to examine the factors that hinder or enable success for this group. The theoretical framework or scholarly bearings for the study comes from the critical social model of disability, disability services scholarship in the United States, and education theory literature on “student success”. With a particular focus on students with bipolar disorder, the article highlights the gaps in disability scholarship on this specific group while underscoring the oppression experienced by them through the inclusion of an autoethnographic segment by the primary author in this collaborative, scholarly work. The model of access, we propose, moves beyond accommodations—which are often retrofits or after the thought arrangements made by an institution—and asks for environmental support, social and institutional inclusion, and consideration for students with psychiatric health diagnosis. This article not only presents an array of problems in the United States academy but also a set of recommendations for solving these problems. Going beyond the regime of retrofit accommodations, we ask for an overhaul of institutional policies, infrastructures, and curricula so that the academy is inclusive of neurodiverse bodies and appreciates their difference.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Thayer ◽  
Rebecca Grossman ◽  
Marissa L. Shuffler ◽  
Shawn Burke ◽  
Eduardo Salas

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Lazzara ◽  
Marissa Shuffler ◽  
Michael Rosen ◽  
Luiz Xavier ◽  
Samuel Wooten ◽  
...  

1955 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Blumer
Keyword(s):  

Disputatio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (50) ◽  
pp. 245-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Haslanger

Abstract In response to commentaries by Esa Díaz León, Jennifer Saul, and Ra- chel Sterken, I develop more fully my views on the role of structure in social and metaphysical explanation. Although I believe that social agency, quite generally, occurs within practices and structures, the relevance of structure depends on the sort of questions we are asking and what interventions we are considering. The emphasis on questions is also relevant in considering metaphysical and meta-metaphysical is- sues about realism with respect to gender and race. I aim to demon- strate that tools we develop in the context of critical social theory can change the questions we ask, what forms of explanation are called for, and how we do philosophy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document