Management of Biochemical Failure of Prostate Cancer after Radical prostatectomy: Recent Advances and Future Opportunities

104 Background: Prostate cancer is the most prevalent non-cutaneous cancer among North American men. Approximately 50% of these are favorable risk cancers; the NCCN guideline recommends active surveillance for these patients. Patients are generally followed by serial PSAs, DREs and/or TRUS-guided biopsies with triggers identified for each test. Consequently, about 30% of these cancers will be reclassified to a higher risk and require definitive treatment. Cases treated with radical prostatectomy (rP) give important insights into the biology of these cancers. Methods: The ASURE database of active surveillance patients was used to identify cases; a retrospective chart review was completed. The following variables were extracted: primary reason for rP; % biochemical failure; % of patients requiring salvage radiation or hormone therapy; Gleason score (GS), tumor size staging and nodal status in the rP specimen; cause and rate of mortality; proportion of patients treated for PSA-doubling times less then 3 years presenting with a GS greater than 7. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Results: Of 566 patients in the ASURE database, the charts of 26 patients having an rP were extracted. The primary cause for an rP was a PSA-doubling times less than 3 years (57% of patients) followed by a biopsy indicating a GS of 4+3 or greater (19%). 7% of patients (2/26) were not reclassified but preferred to be treated with rP. 4 patients had biochemical failure (15%) all 4 had salvage therapy. There was 1 cause-specific death. 85% of rP specimens had GS 7, while the remaining had GS 6. Half of these GS 7 individuals had PSA doubling times of less than 3 years. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy appears to be an effective deferred treatment for patients who are reclassified on active surveillance as evidenced by low prostate-cancer mortality, low rates of biochemical failure acceptable use of salvage therapy. Of interest is that the majority patients with PSAdt < 3 y have Gleason 7 disease on specimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

LONG-TERM HAZARD OF PROGRESSION AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: CONTINUED RISK OF BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER 5 YEARS

The Journal of Urology ◽

10.1097/00005392-200007000-00023 ◽

2000 ◽

pp. 101-105 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

CHRISTOPHER L. AMLING ◽

MICHAEL L. BLUTE ◽

ERIK J. BERGSTRALH ◽

THOMAS M. SEAY ◽

JEFFREY SLEZAK ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Biochemical Failure ◽

Localized Prostate Cancer

Download Full-text

Preoperative Combined Nested Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Prostate-Specific Antigen and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Does Not Correlate With Pathologic Stage or Biochemical Failure in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2002.11.097 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 20 (15) ◽

pp. 3213-3218 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

John Thomas ◽

Manjula Gupta ◽

Ying Grasso ◽

Chandana A. Reddy ◽

Warren D. Heston ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Biochemical Failure ◽

Localized Prostate Cancer ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Pathologic Stage ◽

Kaplan Meier

PURPOSE: We report a prospective study examining the ability of preoperative nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM) to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients were entered onto the study. Preoperative evaluation included clinical T stage, serum PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and serum RT-PCR for PSA/PSM. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to identify predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical failure.RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (51.8%) were RT-PCR positive for PSA, PSM, or both. In the multivariate logistic regression model, only initial PSA was an independent predictor of pathologic stage as defined by organ-confined disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.13; P = .026) or organ-/specimen-confined disease (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.16; P = .009). Overall Kaplan-Meier biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was 85% at 59 months. Multivariate analysis of predictors for bRFS with the Cox proportional hazards model indicated that only initial PSA (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.09; P = .004) and biopsy Gleason score (OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.37 to 9.58; P = .009) were independent predictors of biochemical failure. RT-PCR status did not predict pathologic stage or biochemical failure. Repeat analysis excluding 27 patients who received preoperative androgen-deprivation therapy did not change the results.CONCLUSION: Combined nested RT-PCR for PSA and PSM is not an independent predictor of pathologic stage or biochemical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. This assay has no clinical utility in this patient population.

Download Full-text