scholarly journals Focussed review of the existing maximum residue levels for lambda‐cyhalothrin in light of the unspecific residue definition and the existing good agricultural practices for the substance gamma‐cyhalothrin

EFSA Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Alba Brancato ◽  
Daniela Brocca ◽  
Chloe De Lentdecker ◽  
Zoltan Erdos ◽  
...  
EFSA Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Maria Anastassiadou ◽  
Giovanni Bernasconi ◽  
Alba Brancato ◽  
Luis Carrasco Cabrera ◽  
...  

EFSA Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Himdata Abdourahime ◽  
Maria Anastassiadou ◽  
Alba Brancato ◽  
Daniela Brocca ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1938-1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
MBULAHENI T. MUTENGWE ◽  
LIZYBEN CHIDAMBA ◽  
LISE KORSTEN

ABSTRACTIn most countries, fresh produce sold at local markets is usually not analyzed for agricultural chemical residues as export products are, which raises concerns about the perceived safety levels of local food supplies in contrast with exported products. The aim of this study was to determine pesticide residue levels in fruits and vegetables sold at two of the biggest fresh produce markets in Africa. A total of 199 fruit and vegetable samples were collected between 2012 and 2014 and analyzed for 74 pesticides commonly used in the horticultural sector. Of the samples analyzed, 91% were compliant with set maximum residue levels (MRLs). The remaining samples either contained unregistered chemicals (8%) or exceeded set MRL values (1%). Products containing more than one pesticide residue constituted 4.02% of all samples tested. Imazalil and iprodione were found to be the most frequently detected pesticides (12 samples each). Boscalid, endosulfan, profenofos, and procymidone were associated with the most noncompliance, including exceeding MRL values or being unregistered for the specific crop. The establishment of a national pesticide monitoring program is essential for the country and would ensure that pesticides are used in accordance with good agricultural practices.


EDIS ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesscia A. Lepper ◽  
Aswathy Sreedharan ◽  
Renée Goodrich Schneider ◽  
Keith R. Schneider

Good agricultural practices (GAPs) and good handling practices (GHPs) encompass the general procedures that growers, packers and processors of fresh fruits and vegetables should follow to ensure the safety of their product. GAPs usually deal with preharvest practices (i.e., in the field), while GHPs cover postharvest practices, including packing, storage and shipping. This factsheet covers GAPs relating to packing operation sanitation. There are seven other Florida Cooperative Extension factsheets in the ‘Food Safety on the Farm’ series that focus on specific aspects of the GAPs program and how they relate to Florida crops and practices. Under the new Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), GAPs are a foundation of the Produce Safety Rule (PSR). Other than for round tomatoes in Florida (T-GAPs regulation), GAPs have mainly been a voluntary program. Additionally the PSR mandates all non-exempt operations to follow these new FSMA federal guidelines (6), but all exempt commodities and for those producers exporting to foreign countries, GAPs may still be required. Both the mandatory PSR and GAPs aim to reduce the foodborne illness burden associated with produce.


EFSA Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Maria Anastassiadou ◽  
Giovanni Bernasconi ◽  
Alba Brancato ◽  
Luis Carrasco Cabrera ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document