Comparison of the flexibility of two different stainless steel crowns (3M and MIB) while seating on primary molars

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Sh Mosharafian ◽  
H Afshar ◽  
S Kazemi ◽  
N Abazarian ◽  
◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1418
Author(s):  
MebinGeorge Mathew ◽  
KorishettarBasavaraj Roopa ◽  
AshuJagdish Soni ◽  
Md Muzammil Khan ◽  
Afreen Kauser

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Maryam Hajiahmadi ◽  
Najmeh Akhlaghi ◽  
Mohammad Golbidi

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
BashaerS Abdulhadi ◽  
MedhatM Abdullah ◽  
SumerM Alaki ◽  
NajlaaM Alamoudi ◽  
MoazH Attar

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Keinan ◽  
Eliyahu Mass ◽  
Uri Zilberman

Objective. The purpose of this study was to analyze the absorption of metal ions released from stainless steel crowns by root surface of primary molars.Study Design. Laboratory research: The study included 34 primary molars, exfoliated or extracted during routine dental treatment. 17 molars were covered with stainless-steel crowns for more than two years and compared to 17 intact primary molars. Chemical content of the mesial or distal root surface, 1 mm apically to the crown or the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), was analyzed. An energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) was used for chemical analysis.Results. Higher amounts of nickel, chromium, and iron (5-6 times) were found in the cementum of molars covered with stainless-steel crowns compared to intact molars. The differences between groups were highly significant ().Significance. Stainless-steel crowns release nickel, chromium, and iron in oral environment, and the ions are absorbed by the primary molars roots. The additional burden of allergenic metals should be reduced if possible.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boram Jung ◽  
Jonghyun Shin ◽  
Taesung Jeong ◽  
Jiyeon Kim ◽  
Shin Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document