scholarly journals Evaluation of clinical success, parental and child satisfaction of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in primary molars

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1418
Author(s):  
MebinGeorge Mathew ◽  
KorishettarBasavaraj Roopa ◽  
AshuJagdish Soni ◽  
Md Muzammil Khan ◽  
Afreen Kauser
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Zirconia Crowns

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation on clinical success rate of prefabricated zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns in primary molars

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-186
Author(s):  
A. K. Harshitha ◽  
H. T. Ajay Rao ◽  
K. Sundeep Hegde ◽  
Sharan S. Sargod ◽  
Shrivya Saloni Mahaveeran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Type I ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
Gingival Health ◽  
Zirconia Crowns

To compare the clinical success rate of Prefabricated Zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns on primary molars: It is an in-vivo study which was performed on 52 pulpally treated primary molars of children aged 4–9 years were randomly divided into two equal groups of stainless steel crown and Prefabricated Zirconia crowns. Tooth preparation was done according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and crowns were cemented. All crowns were cemented with Type I Glass ionomer cement (GIC) luting cement. Crowns were evaluated clinically for its crown retention, marginal integrity and gingival health at 3 months and 6 months.: Clinical success for stainless steel crowns and Prefabricated Zirconia crowns towards crown retention and marginal integrity were similar with no statistical difference between them. All Prefabricated Zirconia crowns showed healthy gingiva whereas 53.8% (14 out of 26) Stainless Steel crowns showed mild gingival inflammation at 3 and 6 months which was statistically significant (P ≤0.01). Both prefabricated zirconia and stainless steel crowns showed no statistical difference for crown retention and marginal integrity throughout the study. Gingival health was significantly higher for Prefabricated Zirconia crowns compared with stainless steel crowns. Therefore clinical success rate for Prefabricated Zirconia crowns were better when compared to stainless steel crowns. So Prefabricated Zirconia crowns can be considered as an esthetic alternative in future.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation and Comparison of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars- A Study Protocol

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
Monika M. Khubchandani ◽  
Nilima Thosar
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Zirconia Crowns ◽  
One Year ◽  
Periodic Interval

Aim: The present study will be undertaken to evaluate and compare the clinical success of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in carious primary molars. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital, Duration- One year Methodology: In this Split-mouth, 12 months study, set of primary molars in 4-9 years old children will be restored with stainless steel crown and zirconia crown. The primary objective is the assessment of clinical success by evaluating pain, swelling and pathologic mobility at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months interval. The secondary objectives are to assess the level of parental satisfaction by applying fivepoint likert scale and evaluate the gingival condition by recording Sillness and Loe Plaque index (PI) and Loe and Silness Gingival Index (GI) of study groups at periodic interval of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: The results of the present study will investigate the effectiveness of two types of pediatric full coverage restorations for management of extensive caries in primary molars. Conclusion: The findings of the present research would help the patient and practitioners to select appropriate therapeutic option.

Clinical evaluation between zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns in primary molars teeth

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
BashaerS Abdulhadi ◽  
MedhatM Abdullah ◽  
SumerM Alaki ◽  
NajlaaM Alamoudi ◽  
MoazH Attar
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Zirconia Crowns

Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: An observational follow up study

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1396-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.M. Schüler ◽  
M. Hiller ◽  
T. Roloff ◽  
J. Kühnisch ◽  
R. Heinrich-Weltzien
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Follow Up Study

scholarly journals Use of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in posterior primary teeth for children in different age groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL3) ◽  
pp. 1540-1545
Author(s):  
Manthra Prathoshni S ◽  
Vignesh Ravindran ◽  
Visalakshi Ramanathan
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Early Childhood Caries ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Zirconia Crowns

Children are more susceptible to Early Childhood Caries and trauma. Post endodontic treatment, it is necessary for coverage of the treated teeth, and full crowns are considered to be the best option for the same. Preformed crowns for primary molars are available in many sizes and materials to be placed over decayed or developmentally defective teeth. They can be made completely of stainless steel, stainless steel with a white veneer cover or made wholly of a white ceramic material when aesthetics is concerned. The main aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of usage of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in posterior teeth for pedo patients in different age groups. 89000 case sheets were reviewed between June 2019 - March 2020 for possible inclusion and exclusion criteria. Case sheets of 1496 pediatric patients who underwent stainless steel crown and zirconia crown placement in posterior teeth were obtained from a Private Dental Institute. Collected data were analysed using SPSS statistics software. Results showed that stainless steel crowns were more prevalently used among all age groups (99.54%) and were more prevalent among the age group 0-5 years (69.61%). Stainless steel crowns were also found to be more prevalent among male pediatric patients (57.80%). In Conclusion, stainless steel crowns were most prevalent among all age groups and are more prevalent among male pediatric patients.

Comparison of the flexibility of two different stainless steel crowns (3M and MIB) while seating on primary molars

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Sh Mosharafian ◽  
H Afshar ◽  
S Kazemi ◽  
N Abazarian ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Primary Molars
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document