Vacuum Aspiration for Termination of Pregnancy in Paracervical Block Without Cervical Dilatation by Use of the Karman Cannula

1975 ◽  
Vol 54 (s47) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
P. Atterfelt ◽  
A.-J. Barlinn ◽  
L. Hamberger ◽  
G. Samsioe
2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
O T Owolabi ◽  
J Moodley

The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate and compare paracervical block with diclofenac for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for surgical termination of pregnancy. Participants were randomized into three groups, viz. group (i) diclofenac 75 mg intramuscularly (i.m.) 30 min before the procedure; (ii) diclofenac 75 mg i.m. 30 min before the procedure, together with local infiltration of the cervix with lignocaine 1% (10 mL); (iii) diclofenac 75 mg i.m. 30 min before the procedure together with local infiltration of the cervix with lignocaine 1% (10 mL) and paracervical block with lignocaine 1% (5 mL). There was a significant difference in pain scores during the procedure between groups (i) and (ii) ( P<0.001), and between groups (i) and (iii) ( P<0.001) in pain scores during the procedure. There was no difference in pain score between groups (ii) and (iii) ( P=0.144). Post procedure analysis of pain score also showed significant difference between group (i) on one hand, and groups (ii) and (iii) ( P<0.001), but no significant difference between groups (ii) and (iii)( P=0.029). The local anaesthetic infiltration of the cervix in combination with diclofenac or together with diclofenac and paracervical block provides better pain relief during and after the MVA.


Author(s):  
Jayaraman Nambiar M. ◽  
Hema Prasanna Kurri ◽  
Muralidhar V. Pai

Background: Procedures like dilatation and curettage and manual vacuum aspirations are one of the commonest procedures conducted in the outpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Objective of present study was to find out whether intracervical block is as effective as paracervical block in patients undergoing cervical dilatation and procedures on uterine cavity.Methods: Patients undergoing dilatation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration were given either paracevrical block or intracervical block. The pain during cervical dilatation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration were assessed on a 10 cm visual analogue scale.Results: Mean visual analogue score during dilatation was comparable in both groups. Mean visual analogue score were comparable during dilatation in both groups before curettage or manual vacuum aspiration. Mean visual analogue scores during manual vacuum aspiration or curettage was also comparable with both groups. One patient had a serious side effect of convulsion during paracervical block.Conclusions: Intracervical block is preferable to paracervical block during procedures like cervical dilatation and on procedures on uterine cavity as intracervical block requires less technical precision than paracervical block.


BMJ ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (5844) ◽  
pp. 19-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. H. Badraoui ◽  
J. Bonnar ◽  
K. Hillier ◽  
M. P. Embrey

1977 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M.M. Karim ◽  
S.S. Ratnam ◽  
V. Selvadurai ◽  
W. Wun ◽  
R.N.V. Prasad

Cervagem ◽  
1983 ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Ho ◽  
S. T. Liang ◽  
G. W. K. Tang ◽  
H. K. Ma

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1938-1939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Deffieux ◽  
Aminata Kane ◽  
Erika Faivre ◽  
Amélie Gervaise ◽  
René Frydman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document