Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Previously Treated Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Roa ◽  
Anita Conner ◽  
R. Brian Mitchell
2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumiyoshi Ohyanagi ◽  
Atsushi Horiike ◽  
Yoshio Okano ◽  
Yukitoshi Satoh ◽  
Sakae Okumura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Naruo Yoshimura ◽  
Kenji Sawa ◽  
Toshiyuki Nakai ◽  
Yoshiya Matsumoto ◽  
Shigeki Mitsuoka ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Sun Young Kyung ◽  
Sang Pyo Lee ◽  
Jeong Woong Park ◽  
Sung Hwan Jung ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Guerra ◽  
P. Lianes ◽  
L. Paz-Ares ◽  
D. Castellano ◽  
C. Gómez-Martín ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (24) ◽  
pp. 2667-2674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Scagliotti ◽  
Joachim von Pawel ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Rodryg Ramlau ◽  
Adolfo Favaretto ◽  
...  

Purpose Tivantinib, a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated increased anticancer activity in preclinical and early clinical studies when combined with erlotinib. Our study aimed to confirm efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC previously treated with one to two systemic regimens, including a platinum doublet, were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 150 mg daily plus oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (E + T) or erlotinib plus placebo (E + P) until disease progression. Tumor specimens were evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations, MET expression, and MET gene amplification. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), OS in molecular subgroups, and safety. Results The study enrolled 1,048 patients and was discontinued for futility at the interim analysis. OS did not improve with E + T versus E + P (median OS, 8.5 v 7.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .81), even though PFS increased (median PFS, 3.6 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested OS improvement in patients with high MET expression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.01). Most common adverse events occurring with E + T versus E + P were rash (33.1% v 37.3%, respectively), diarrhea (34.6% v 41.0%), asthenia or fatigue (43.5% v 38.1%), and neutropenia (grade 3 to 4; 8.5% v 0.8%). Conclusion E + T was well tolerated and increased PFS but did not improve OS in the overall nonsquamous NSCLC population.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7034-7034 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Fanucchi ◽  
F. Fossella ◽  
P. Fidias ◽  
R. B. Natale ◽  
R. J. Belt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document