scholarly journals Comparative Theory on Three Instructional Designs: Dick and Carrey, Kemp, and Three Phases

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
nurul azizah ria kusrini

Teaching English seems somehow easy but it is practically hard to do. Teaching without method is like a cooking without recipe. Therefore, teachers must know what methods or models are suitable for their class and materials. This study help the teachers to give further information about three well-known and the most common used instructional design models, Dick and Carey, Kemp, and Three phases. This study broke these theories and provided the way to implement them into classroom. Furthermore, this study also peeled out the differences and the similarities of each instructional design. It is hoped to help the teachers to design their own models by developing and combining these three instructional designs.

Author(s):  
Andrew S. Gibbons ◽  
Elizabeth Boling ◽  
Kennon M. Smith

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
Warren Wyrostek ◽  
Steven Downey

Practitioners use an expansive array of instructional design models. Although many of these models acknowledge the need for analyzing occupational roles, they do not define steps for conducting these analyses. This article reviews prominent models and provides prescriptive guidance for selecting appropriate models given a project’s (a) Product Requirements, (b) Resource Availability, and (c) Philosophical Compatibility with DACUM (Developing a CurriculUM) procedures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
Huseyin Uzunboylu ◽  
Emine Kosucu

Instructional design and instructional systems design concepts different from the direction of the field lead to confusion as it includes similar use cases from time to time. Instructional design models have different characteristics, and in different areas, in line with the needs of nature according to the purpose of alternating the use of different models, it affects the efficiency. Each model is developed that fixing the underlying spots is the best way to a need for designs designed which varies depending on the model. Some models of the objectives underlying the selection and use of different models have the highest level while improving strategies constitute a more important structure. With this assessment, the instructional design, instructional systems design, systems approach and instructional system design models, by examining the historical development of these models and their distinctive features, will be explained in connection with curriculum development. Thus, referring to the different points of each model and specific model, with respect to instructional systems design, the difference in instructional design, space and design process is studied. Keywords: Instructional systems design, instructional design, instructional design models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idris Göksu ◽  
Kursat Volkan Özcan ◽  
Recep Cakir ◽  
Yuksel Göktas

<p class="JLDAbstract">This study examines studies on instructional design models by applying content analysis. It covers 113 papers published in 44 international Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and Science Citation Index (SCI) journals. Studies on instructional design models are explored in terms of journal of publication, preferred model, country where the study was conducted, research method, data collection tool, data analysis method, sampling interval, and field in which the model was applied. Studies are also examined in terms of variables, focusing on connections with model used, relevant results, and orientation of the model (e.g., system-oriented, class-oriented, or product-oriented). Results identified the most preferred models as ADDIE, ARCS, Gagne and Briggs, 4C-ID, and Dick and Carey. System-based instructional design models were most common. These results show recent trends in instructional design models and will contribute to both researchers and instructional designers.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document