scholarly journals Patient Satisfaction With Breast Cancer Follow-Up Care Provided By Family Physicians

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 710-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thind ◽  
Y. Liu ◽  
R. C. Maly
2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vanhuyse ◽  
P.L. Bedard ◽  
J. Sheiner ◽  
B. Fitzgerald ◽  
M. Clemons

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19603-19603
Author(s):  
C. O. Ruud ◽  
K. Francis ◽  
C. Stephens ◽  
M. H. Rajab

19603 Background: The ASCO 2006 guidelines specify that regularly scheduled follow-up care of breast cancer survivors should be the standard. Follow up care is a “teachable moment” to train survivors in positive habits. A group visit model at the Cleveland Clinic proved feasible and improved patient satisfaction for other diseases. Our objectives include assessing the feasibility of an adapted group follow-up visit for the care of breast cancer patients and patient satisfaction. Methods: A feasibility study targeting breast cancer patients who completed primary therapy and were scheduled for a routine appointment. We mailed letters inviting patients to a follow-up group visit. Patients were divided into 3 groups, each scheduled for a separate (90–120 minute). During the first half of the visit, participants were divided into three groups; 5-minute physician exam, nurse review of medications and vital signs, and instruction by a social worker. Groups were rotated. During the second half the doctor, nurse, and social worker met with all participants in one room starting with an educational presentation about fatigue and exercise. Each participant was subsequently interviewed by the physician in the presence of their peers. Shared complaints were investigated first. Patients rated their satisfaction with the different parts of the visit on a scale of 1–5. Participants were surveyed pre- and post- education session and asked if they would participate again. Participants were allowed to bring a family member or friend. Results: 29 (29.6 %) out of 98 consented and 22 (22.5%) attended;10 in first visit, 5 in second visit and 7 in last visit. Average age 61±8, ranged from 46–72 years. Most participants were satisfied with all parts of the group visit, except two in the first group were less satisfied with the check in process and moving between rooms. Comparing the pre- vs. post- educational session surveys showed an improved understanding of the importance of fatigue or exercise. 17 (77%) out of 22 participants agreed to participate in another group visit. Conclusion: Group visit format is feasible and provides patient satisfaction. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20613-e20613
Author(s):  
Melini Gupta ◽  
Carol A. Townsley ◽  
Ed Kucharski ◽  
Rashida Haq ◽  
Linda Muraca ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S Wojcinski ◽  
A Farrokh ◽  
U Hille ◽  
E Hirschauer ◽  
W Schmidt ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherrie H. Kaplan ◽  
Rebecca A. Silliman

Author(s):  
Cathrine Lundgaard Riis ◽  
Mette Stie ◽  
Troels Bechmann ◽  
Pernille Tine Jensen ◽  
Angela Coulter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document