scholarly journals Catchment vegetation and erosion controls soil carbon cycling in south-eastern Australia during the last two Glacial-Interglacial cycles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Francke ◽  
Anthony Dosseto ◽  
Matt Forbes ◽  
Haidee Cadd ◽  
Julia Short ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Carbon Cycling ◽  
South Eastern ◽  
Soil Carbon Cycling ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
South Eastern Australia

The relationships between land uses, soil management practices, and soil carbon fractions in South Eastern Australia

2014 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 41-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M.Fazle Rabbi ◽  
Matthew Tighe ◽  
Annette Cowie ◽  
Brian R. Wilson ◽  
Graeme Schwenke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Soil Management ◽  
Land Uses ◽  
Carbon Fractions ◽  
South Eastern ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
Soil Carbon Fractions ◽  
South Eastern Australia

Carbon-neutral wool farming in south-eastern Australia

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Doran-Browne ◽  
John Ive ◽  
Phillip Graham ◽  
Richard J. Eckard
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Carbon Stocks ◽  
Pasture Production ◽  
South Eastern ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
Soil Carbon Stocks ◽  
Carbon Neutral ◽  
South Eastern Australia

Ruminant livestock production generates higher levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) compared with other types of farming. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce or offset those emissions where possible. Although mitigation options exist that reduce ruminant GHGE through the use of feed management, flock structure or breeding management, these options only reduce the existing emissions by up to 30% whereas planting trees and subsequent carbon sequestration in trees and soil has the potential for livestock emissions to be offset in their entirety. Trees can introduce additional co-benefits that may increase production such as reduced salinity and therefore increased pasture production, shelter for animals or reduced erosion. Trees will also use more water and compete with pastures for water and light. Therefore, careful planning is required to locate trees where the co-benefits can be maximised instead of any negative trade-offs. This study analysed the carbon balance of a wool case study farm, Talaheni, in south-eastern Australia to determine if the farm was carbon neutral. The Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory was used to calculate GHGE and carbon stocks, with national emissions factors used where available, and otherwise figures from the IPCC methodology being used. Sources of GHGE were from livestock, energy and fuel, and carbon stocks were present in the trees and soil. The results showed that from when the farm was purchased in 1980–2012 the farm had sequestered 11 times more carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) in trees and soil than was produced by livestock and energy. Between 1980 and 2012 a total of 31 100 t CO2e were sequestered with 19 300 and 11 800 t CO2e in trees and soil, respectively, whereas farm emissions totalled 2800 t CO2e. There was a sufficient increase in soil carbon stocks alone to offset all GHGE at the study site. This study demonstrated that there are substantial gains to be made in soil carbon stocks where initial soils are eroded and degraded and there is the opportunity to increase soil carbon either through planting trees or introducing perennial pastures to store more carbon under pastures. Further research would be beneficial on the carbon-neutral potential of farms in more fertile, high-rainfall areas. These areas typically have higher stocking rates than the present study and would require higher levels of carbon stocks for the farm to be carbon neutral.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document