scholarly journals Integrating distribution models and habitat classification maps into marine protected area planning.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Ferrari ◽  
Hamish Malcolm ◽  
Joe Neilson ◽  
Vanessa Lucieer ◽  
Alan Jordan ◽  
...  

Effective conservation planning requires biotic data across an entire region. In data-poor ecosystems conservation planning is informed by using environmental surrogates (e.g. temperature) predominantly in two ways: to develop habitat classification schemes (1) or develop species distribution models (2). We test the utility of both approaches for conservation planning of marine ecosystems, and rank environmental surrogates, such as depth and distance from shore, according to their power to predict the distribution and abundance of biotic species. Specifically, we compared a habitat classification scheme; based on coarse levels of habitat types derived from depth and distance from shore; against species distribution models, which predict fish abundance and prevalence as a function of environmental surrogates (depth, distance from shore, latitude, reef area, zoning, and several metrics of habitat structural complexity). We consistently set conservation target levels to 21% of each conservation feature, following global standards and a sensitivity analyses. Thus when running scenarios to protect fish species we aimed to protect at least 21% of each species, and when running scenarios of habitat classes, we aimed to protect at least 21% of each habitat class. We found that when aiming to protect 21% of the chosen conservation targets, distribution models protected 21% of the predicted abundance/occurrence of all modelled species and functional groups, but did not protect most habitats. Contrastingly, using a habitat classification scheme protected 21% of all habitat types and 34% of all species and functional groups, but required protecting three times more area. Thus, using only distribution models as targets in data-poor ecosystems could be a risky conservation planning strategy. Ultimately the best conservation outcomes were achieved by incorporating local knowledge to synthesize the conservation outcomes of both scenarios.

Ecosphere ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. art42 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Farrell ◽  
B. A. Collier ◽  
K. L. Skow ◽  
A. M. Long ◽  
A. J. Campomizzi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 252 ◽  
pp. 108822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago José Elías Velazco ◽  
Bruno R. Ribeiro ◽  
Livia Maira Orlandi Laureto ◽  
Paulo De Marco Júnior

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1591-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
BETTE A. LOISELLE ◽  
CHRISTINE A. HOWELL ◽  
CATHERINE H. GRAHAM ◽  
JAQUELINE M. GOERCK ◽  
THOMAS BROOKS ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e113749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana L. Porfirio ◽  
Rebecca M. B. Harris ◽  
Edward C. Lefroy ◽  
Sonia Hugh ◽  
Susan F. Gould ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Monica D. Parisi ◽  
Steven E. Greco

Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) represent the most powerful tool in statute for regional and systematic conservation planning for species at risk in California. This study examines the use of species conceptual models (SCMs) and species distribution models (SDMs) in such planning. Eighteen Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) were analyzed to determine if or how explicit connections were made between both types of models for a covered species and key components of its conservation strategy. Results indicate plans were strong in the use of SDMs, however, each deferred preparing or using SCMs to later management and monitoring phases. A more effective best planning practice for developing a conservation strategy is to explicitly integrate SCMs and SDMs during plan preparation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1119-1136
Author(s):  
Matthew Swan ◽  
Mark Le Pla ◽  
Julian Di Stefano ◽  
Jack Pascoe ◽  
Trent D. Penman

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. e25864
Author(s):  
Rabetrano Tsiky

Recognizing the abundance and the accumulation of information and data on biodiversity that are still poorly exploited and even unfunded, the REBIOMA project (Madagascar Biodiversity Networking), in collaboration with partners, has developed an online dataportal in order to provide easy access to information and critical data, to support conservation planning and the expansion of scientific and professional activities in Madagascar biodiversity. The mission of the REBIOMA data portal is to serve quality-labeled, up-to-date species occurrence data and environmental niche models for Madagascar’s flora and fauna, both marine and terrestrial. REBIOMA is a project of the Wildlife Conservation Society Madagascar and the University of California, Berkeley. REBIOMA serves species occurrence data for marine and terrestrial regions of Madagascar. Following upload, data is automatically validated against a geographic mask and a taxonomic authority. Data providers can decide whether their data will be public, private, or shared only with selected collaborators. Data reviewers can add quality labels to individual records, allowing selection of data for modeling and conservation assessments according to quality. Portal users can query data in numerous ways. One of the key features of the REBIOMA web portal is its support for species distribution models, created from taxonomically valid and quality-reviewed occurrence data. Species distribution models are produced for species for which there are at least eight, reliably reviewed, non-duplicate (per grid cell) records. Maximum Entropy Modeling (MaxEnt for short) is used to produce continuous distribution models from these occurrence records and environmental data for different eras: past (1950), current (2000), and future (2080). The result is generally interpreted as a prediction of habitat suitability. Results for each model are available on the portal and ready for download as ASCII and HTML files. The REBIOMA Data Portal address is http://data.rebioma.net, or visit http://www.rebioma.netfor more general information about the entire REBIOMA project.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document